Answer:
Organic Solidarity
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is an example of a term known as Organic Solidarity. This term explains the union in society from individuals depending on one another in advanced societies, where this interdependence usually occurs from the specialization of work between individuals. Such as John needing to depend on a computer repair technician to fix his computer.
Answer: interest earned = $8942372340
$8942672340 this is amount after 25 years.
Explanation:
formula used: S= R*[ (1+<em>i </em>)ⁿ-1 / <em>i </em>]
where:
S is future value
R is periodic payment
<em>i </em> is interest rate period
n is number of periods
R= $3000
n= 65-40=25 now 25*4=100 QUARTERLY that is why we used 4
<em>i </em>= 55% which is equal to 0.55
so, for quarterly <em>i= </em>0.55/4= 0.138
now putting them in formula given above
S= 3000*[ (1+0.138)¹⁰⁰-1] / 0.138
S= $8942672340 (future value )
total money deposited = number of period * periodic amount
= $3000*100 = $300,000
interest earned = future value - total money deposited
= 8942672340 - 300,000
interest earned = $8942372340
Answer:
$1,956,684
Explanation:
As the project has a expected annual return, we have to calculate future value of this investment to find how much money Cll, Inc. will have after 10 years to reinvest.
We know,
FV = PV × 
Given,
Present Value, PV = $630,000
Annual rate of return, i = 12% = 0.12
Number of period, n = 10 years
Putting the value into the above formula, we can get,
FV = $630,000 × 
FV = $630,000 × 3.105848
FV = $1,956,684
$1,956,684 can be reinvested after the liquidation of 10 years.
Answer:
A. Recent environmental research reveals that the dust from the limestone quarrying site has severely contaminated the water at a nearby lake.
Explanation:
The limestone production results in huge social effects like, noise pollution, soil pollution, which affects lives of people. And since the manufacturers or producers of limestone do not care about the social results of such production, they shall be liable to pay huge taxes.
As for this, the cause as stated in statement A is absolutely suitable.
Also the prices are more in this area even after so much of social destruction.
Accordingly high taxes as a penalty for such social destruction shall be charged.
Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
