Answer:
American Revolution (Revolutionary War). After French and Indian War British government introduced many laws that were harsh. Those Acts and laws enraged the colonists, as they believed they were deprived of their rights.
Explanation:
The greatest opposition was created after Quartering Act was introduces, according to which British soldiers could stay in the homes of colonist. Of course, later some new laws additional enraged people, that started asking for justice. At the end it all led to war between colonists and British authorities.
We are passive recipients until aware of the way we develop. You cannot fully control either.
Answer:
d. participant observation
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that in this situation Mary is using participant observation as a method of gathering data. This is a research method where the researcher (in this case Mary) observes the participants of the study but also engages with them in order to better gather more detailed information. Such as Mary has done by also volunteering in order to gather data on the other women.
Answer:
The correct answer is Mass
Explanation:
The reason this was of extreme importance for monk and nuns is because this was the time they could here through the priest the word of God and to adore Jesus.
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>