Psychological and social factors such as anger, as well as inflammation, insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, and high triglyceride levels are all contributing risk factors for CVD that can be changed
<u>Explanation:</u>
Cardiovascular disease danger determinants can be divided into a pair of categories: modifiable and non-modifiable. Modifiable cardiovascular disease hazard determinants are those that can be overcome or managed with revised action. By performing some day to day action modifications, one can able to diminish their risks of acquiring cardiovascular disease.
Staying active is advantageous for your body fitness to reduce the contributing factors that are the dominant promoter of attack. By excluding hazard determinants that you can adapt, you may considerably decrease your chance of attack.
Answer:
With the increase of autos in the 1950s, the demand for good quality roads increased. The federal government passed the Interstate Highway Act, 1956, pumping $1 billion a year into the construction of roads. By 1960, $2.9 billion was being used a year. The construction encouraged urban sprawl, as more people could now live in the suburbs and drive the freeways into the cities for work. But it also marked the beginning of the end to the city as a livable location. The middle class left the city to live in the suburbs, urban neighborhoods were split into isolated residential islands walled off from each other by concrete abutments of the freeways. this might not help but here
Explanation:
<span>Corelation does not determine causation. Several factors play into murder rates and overall crime rates that effect them. In traditional experimentation you change one thing as the variable and keep all other factors constant. In society we do not have the luxury of being able to change only obe variable. Also, a study of potential nation wide policy toward combating a problem should include more than just five data points.</span>
Answer:
As Mary is a newly-hired police officer, she observes two fellow officers removing drugs from the evidence room. Mary's values include devotion to loyalty, so Mary is inclined to protect her fellow officers. At the same time, Mary also believes in upholding the law. Mary's decision to report the crime had negative effects for the two officers involved, and for Mary personally. however, the rest of the community has benefited from the removal of corrupt police officers. A(n) utilitarian viewpoint would find this outcome to be ethical.
Explanation:
As we can see that Mary has taken the decision which is ethical from the utilitarian viewpoint. In utilitarian viewpoint, we decide and make decisions on the basis of the outcomes, We put efforts and decide whats going to be the likely outcome and results of our decisions. We mainly see the consequences and then proceed to make the decision. Moreover, in this viewpoint, moral values, ethics and justice is also given the main weightage. we focus not only our personal benefits but we see the benefits of large number of people. If we like something and other people do not like it then we will not make that decision. If two people in a group want to go to China for summer holidays, and five people are preferring going to London, then our decision will be going to London because in this case we can benefit more number of people. Same is the case here, Mary wants to proceed while thinking the benefits of its community.
