I believe the answer is: high magnitude of consequences.
Event with high magnitude of consequences refers to the type of event which resulted in negative impact for a large number of people (such as loss of many jobs, destruction of health, etc) . Such event usually ignited by immoral actions that conducted for small group of people to obtain certain level of profit or desire.
D. because an employee with good work ethics can prove to be an efficient resource overall ( because its common sense)
The requirement of Kameron, Candice, and Leo should be for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
The information related to the pledged asset is as follows:
- A pledged asset is a valuable possession that could be transferred to the lender in order to secure the debt or a loan.
- The pledged asset should be considered as collateral that could be held by a lender and in return, it is for lending the funds.
- Also, it can decrease the down payment that should be needed for the loan along with this if there is any change in the interest rate so the same should be decreased.
Therefore we can conclude that, the requirement done by these three people is needed for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
Learn more about the LLC here: brainly.com/question/1214636
Answer:
A. The company paid a higher cost for the direct materials than allowed by the standards.
Explanation:
The following is a logical explanation for this variance:
Since, the standard quantity of raw materials to be used is 22 pounds x 500 units = 11000 pounds. The actual usage is 9500 pounds ony. Hence, variance in direct material price variance can be only due to higher cost of direct material purchased.
Answer: An unfavorable variance can be used to detect a drop in estimated income early, and then solutions to the challenge can be identified.
Explanation:
An unfavorable variance is the difference between a company's projected expectation and the actual outcome of a financial activity of the company, where the actual outcome is less favorable than the projected expectation.
The information from an unfavorable variance can help alert a company to a negative outcome early, and the company's leadership can then find ways of solving the cause of the negative outcome.
