Answer:
Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech) it was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, stating that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was stipulated as a First Amendment Revision protecting freedom of expression and freedom of the press to apply in the US states.
Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer) this is a case of the United States Supreme Court. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required, under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, to provide a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that cannot afford their own lawyers.
I would say to, protect people because the people in the society can’t call military forces or something like that to protect themselves but the government can.
Sorry if I’m wrong.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the passage of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they believed that, in the lack of a bill of rights, the new national government would be overly powerful and harm individual liberty.
<h3>What was a fear of the Anti-Federalists?</h3>
The fear of an all-powerful federal authority that might violate their rights was shared by the anti-federalists. To ensure that their rights would be upheld, they demanded a Bill of Rights. The Federal Government is All-Powerful.
A powerful central government was resisted by the Anti-Federalists. It omitted the bill of rights and gave the federal government excessive power at the expense of state and local government authority. gave federal governments unrestricted power, and the strongest case against it was that it wasn't included.
The Anti-Federalists opposed the passage of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they believed that, in the lack of a bill of rights, the new national government would be overly powerful and harm individual liberty.
To learn more about Anti-Federalists refer to:
brainly.com/question/857535
#SPJ4