Answer:
C) Asking the consumer to write his or her own letter to exercise that opt out right
Explanation:
The whole purpose behind the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)was to allow customers the right to easily opt out of information sharing by the banks. That means that the banks are required to provide an easy way for a customer to do so, and writing your own letter might be easy for some people, but very difficult for others.
It is much easier to do it by phone, or by simply mailing back a detachable form. If the client knows how to use internet and emails properly, then the bank must provide an easy option to opt out through an email or an option that can be found in the bank's website.
Answer: performance feedback
Explanation: Feedback on performance is a process of communication. It should be continuous as improvements are made on the basis of information exchanged between the manager and the subordinates. Regular follow-up dialogue should be in place to determine success.
Feedback is structured to see where things go right and where they go wrong. This suggests that leaders may need to be vigilant while they develop new behaviors and conquer the learning curves of new skills.
Answer:
Primary Research Data.
Explanation:
Entrepreneur can collect the primary data by themselves. They can collect in numerous available methods and options. They can collect it either with the help of questionnaires or by taking interviews. Many more options like open ended questionnaires or close ended questionnaires then can be opted accordingly. Likewise, in-depth interviews can be conducted to collect more valuable insights about the customers which definitely can be very helpful fo the entrepreneurs in order to make strategical and tactical level decisions quite effectively.
Answer: 204.76%
Explanation:
In the earlier scenario, furniture maker manufactured 47 (42 non defective) pieces per 5 laborers working 8 hours day.
Thus, the productivity in terms of units per labor hour is as follows:
= 1.05
Similarly, after the process improvement, the productivity in units per labor hour would be:
= 3.2
Thus change in productivity would be calculated as:
= 2.047 × 100
= 204.76%
Thus, the productivity of non defective parts would increase by 204.76%.
