Monthly payment because she pays it every 30 days
Fertilizer and manure can be added to the soil in order to increase the yield of crops. Fertilizer, however, has more nutrients in it and is therefore more beneficial to growing plants. Manure can be prepared in fields (created by animal and plant wastes) while fertilizer is created in factories (using chemical compounds). Manure provides humus to the soil while fertilizer does not, but fertilizer is absorbed by plants more quickly than manure.
This is a case of Food safety fraud by Penanut corporation of America and the culprits where sentenced to prison in Albany,Georgia
Explanation:
- In the above mentioned case the managers (c)who shipped the product knowing that it was contaminated where also punished .
- The managers where punished for their role in shipping the salmonella -positive peanut product,for falsifying the microbiological results.
- The evidence of the trial reflected that tainted food shipping led to a salmonella outbreak in 2009 with more than 700 reported cases of salmonella poisoning in 46 states.
Answer:
The amount of the prepaid portion that is due back to Ashley using the 12 month, 360 day proration is=$362.34
Explanation:
<em>Step 1: Determine HOA per day</em>
Use the expression below to determine HOA per day;
T=H×N
where;
T=total HOA dues per year
H=HOA per day
N=number of days in a year
In our case;
T=$660
H=unknown
N=360 days
Replacing;
660=H×360
360 H=660
H=660/360
H=$1.83 per day
<em>Step 2: Determine amount of HOA that is due back</em>
Using the same expression;
T=H×N
but;
T=unknown
H=$1.83 per day
N=(June, 15 days)+(July, 30)+(Aug, 31)+(Sep. 30)+(Oct 31)+(Nov 30)+(Dec 31)
N=(15+30+31+30+31+30+31)=198 days
Replacing;
T=(1.83×198)=$362.34
The amount of the prepaid portion that is due back to Ashley using the 12 month, 360 day proration is=$362.34
Answer:
The answer is "No Effect
".
Explanation:
In the situation wherein the write-off would not affect the 2019 net earnings, the write-off reduces that both debt accounts as well as the benefit counter-asset for similar quantities. Whenever an expenditure was recognized, net revenues were affected, therefore, there will be nothing to write off under the allowance approach, so the response is no effect.