1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ohaa [14]
2 years ago
7

If investors believe that a stock is not providing a return that sufficiently compensates them for the risk of the stock, they w

ill _________. sell the stock, driving its market price down and its expected return up hold the stock until the return increases to match its risk sell the stock which will drive its expected return even lower buy the stock, driving its market price up and its expected return down
Business
1 answer:
jarptica [38.1K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

<u>sell the stock which will drive it's expected return even lower.</u>

Explanation:

An investor wants to be compensated for the risk undertaken in the form of return. When investors believe that a stock is not providing sufficient return, such stocks would be sold by the investor.

When a stock is not performing well i.e it's current market price goes down, all the investors holding that stock will sell it , leading to it's market price going further down.

Since the market price goes further down, the expected return on such a stock would further decline.

You might be interested in
Jan pay $70 each month for her auto insurance policy. This regular payment is call a
Svetach [21]
Monthly payment because she pays it every 30 days
7 0
3 years ago
Difference between mature and fertilizer​
Daniel [21]

Fertilizer and manure can be added to the soil in order to increase the yield of crops. Fertilizer, however, has more nutrients in it and is therefore more beneficial to growing plants. Manure can be prepared in fields (created by animal and plant wastes) while fertilizer is created in factories (using chemical compounds). Manure provides humus to the soil while fertilizer does not, but fertilizer is absorbed by plants more quickly than manure.

8 0
3 years ago
Stewart Parnell, the former CEO of the now-bankrupt Peanut Corporation of America, was charged with falsifying food safety repor
slega [8]

This is a case of Food safety fraud by Penanut corporation of America and the culprits where sentenced to prison in Albany,Georgia

Explanation:

  • In the above mentioned case the managers (c)who shipped the product knowing that it was contaminated where also punished .
  • The managers where punished for their role in shipping the salmonella -positive peanut product,for falsifying the microbiological results.
  • The evidence of the trial reflected that tainted food shipping  led to a salmonella outbreak in 2009 with more than 700 reported cases of salmonella poisoning in 46 states.

4 0
3 years ago
Ashley Anderson pays her HOA dues of $660 for the calendar year. She then sells her property and closes on June 15. What is the
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

The amount of the prepaid portion that is due back to Ashley using the 12 month, 360 day proration is=$362.34

Explanation:

<em>Step 1: Determine HOA per day</em>

Use the expression below to determine HOA per day;

T=H×N

where;

T=total HOA dues per year

H=HOA per day

N=number of days in a year

In our case;

T=$660

H=unknown

N=360 days

Replacing;

660=H×360

360 H=660

H=660/360

H=$1.83 per day

<em>Step 2: Determine amount of HOA that is due back</em>

Using the same expression;

T=H×N

but;

T=unknown

H=$1.83 per day

N=(June, 15 days)+(July, 30)+(Aug, 31)+(Sep. 30)+(Oct 31)+(Nov 30)+(Dec 31)

N=(15+30+31+30+31+30+31)=198 days

Replacing;

T=(1.83×198)=$362.34

The amount of the prepaid portion that is due back to Ashley using the 12 month, 360 day proration is=$362.34

5 0
3 years ago
During a conversation with the credit manager, one of Tabor's sales representatives learns that a $1,234 receivable from a bankr
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

The answer is "No Effect ".

Explanation:

In the situation wherein the write-off would not affect the 2019 net earnings, the write-off reduces that both debt accounts as well as the benefit counter-asset for similar quantities. Whenever an expenditure was recognized, net revenues were affected, therefore, there will be nothing to write off under the allowance approach, so the response is no effect.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Appliance Possible Inc. (AP) is a manufacturer of toaster ovens. To improve control over operations, the president of AP wants t
    9·1 answer
  • The market for carbon allowances
    5·1 answer
  • Assume that the company wanted to do some
    5·1 answer
  • Selected information from Large Corporation's accounting records and financial statements for 2013 is as follows ($ in millions)
    14·1 answer
  • The marketing researcher for Pooch Party, a manufacturer of toys for dogs, has noticed an increased trend in pet owners dressing
    12·1 answer
  • The Howe Co. stockholders equity account follows: Common stock (400,00 shares at $4par) $1,600,000 Paid in capital in excess in
    6·1 answer
  • What does the World Bank hope will result from the loans it makes to developing countries?
    9·2 answers
  • How creamy is creamy
    5·2 answers
  • Which pricing policy would be best suited for a company that specializes in one unique product? Explain.
    9·1 answer
  • which theory posits that people choose how hard or how long to work toward something based on perceptions about whether that wor
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!