1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Usimov [2.4K]
3 years ago
13

Differences between northern and southern colonies in the 1700s

History
1 answer:
zalisa [80]3 years ago
4 0
Northern: No slaves, mostly republican (our democrat) ideas, economy was based on trade and business

Southern: Slavery was supported, mostly (our idea of) republican, their economy was based on plantations and slaves

Hope this helps! Please let me know if I'm wrong or missed something. :) 
You might be interested in
Although he began to rule well as king in Judah, Amaziah, son of Joash, did not fully follow the way of David.
Phoenix [80]

truuuuuuuueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

7 0
3 years ago
С
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

The United States feared the spread of communism.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it useful for historians to craft historical narratives
cricket20 [7]

<u>Answer:</u>

It is<em> helpful in light of the fact that the specialty of chronicled accounts</em> make conceivable to see that numerous accounts, including quantitative ones, were stories that accomplished their <em>convincing impacts to some extent since they were accounts. </em>

Numerous highlights of chronicled translation could be comprehended as properties of accounts.

Account <em>history is composing history as a story that spotlights on the sequential request of history</em>. There are a few reasons why It is valuable for.

6 0
3 years ago
An old problem the National Assembly still faced was
serg [7]
An old problem the National Assembly still faced was rising debt and poverty.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statements accurately describe results of the United States' entry into World War I?
lakkis [162]
D. geographically the allies should have lost. the us was farther from where the war happened and their late entrance injected a fresh set of supplies and troops to the mix. a is not necessarily true because it doesn't apply specifically to ww1...we already had more than 1 mill troops before the entry. b is irrelevant to the war and just false.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What contributed to the Battle of Stalingrad becoming a turning point in the war?
    15·2 answers
  • According to Elanor, science and math are not the endpoint. So what ar
    8·2 answers
  • How did radio change the American way of life
    6·1 answer
  • In the late 1980s, __________ became the first state to create a computerized database of suspected gang members.​
    10·1 answer
  • At the Lowell Textile Mill: Question 3 options:
    15·1 answer
  • Who supports public education? Democrats or Republicans?
    9·1 answer
  • NEED ANSWER NOW!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • How strictly was the ban against enslaving Muslims<br> observed in Hausaland?
    8·1 answer
  • Douglass died at his cedar hill home on what date and at what age?.
    5·1 answer
  • Hammurabi's biggest contribution to modern, Western civilization is:
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!