1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ganezh [65]
3 years ago
14

25 Points

History
2 answers:
Alla [95]3 years ago
8 0
1. The answer to the question is B. Drug tests of the athletes were reasonable searches.
2. The answer to the question is B. Students are protected from the unreasonable searches.
3. The answer to the question is B. Helped provide equal opportunities for minority students.
4. The answer to the question is D. The medical school denied his application because of racial quotas.
BaLLatris [955]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

hello maxim!

Explanation:

What did the Supreme Court decide in Vernonia v. Acton?

b.Drug tests of athletes were reasonable searches.

Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 1995, ruled (6–3) that an Oregon school board's random drug-testing policy for student athletes was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Which was a finding by the Supreme Court in New Jersey v. T.L.O.?

b.Students are protected from unreasonable searches.

In a juvenile court, T.L.O. argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used.

Supporters of affirmative action argued that the programs

b.helped provide equal opportunities for minority students.

Supporters of affirmative action argued that the programs. addressed discrimination that had occurred in the past. helped provide equal opportunities for minority students. were a form of “reverse discrimination” but were still acceptable.

Allen Bakke, the student involved in Regents v. Bakke, argued that

d.the medical school denied his application because of racial quotas

In Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that a university's use of racial "quotas" in its admissions process was unconstitutional, but a school's use of "affirmative action" to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.  

The case involved the admissions practices of the Medical School of the University of California at Davis. The medical school reserved 16 out of 100 seats in its entering class for minorities, including "Blacks," "Chicanos," "Asians," and "American Indians."  

The rigid admissions quota was administered by a special school committee. Allan Bakke, a white applicant, was twice denied admission to the medical school even though his MCAT scores, GPA, and benchmark scores were "significantly higher" than those of some minority applicants recently admitted.

You might be interested in
In which two early social movements were religious groups involved?
Arada [10]
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
6 0
3 years ago
What finally settled the presidential election of 1876
grandymaker [24]

Answer:“In 1876, there was a much bigger dispute,” he says, referring to the election in which Republican Rutherford B. Hayes eventually emerged as president after neither major party candidate earned enough electoral votes to win without 20 disputed electors

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How long was Mary's voyage to the United States?
Klio2033 [76]
20 hours and 42 minutes
4 0
3 years ago
Southerners opposed to developing industry in the south for all of the following reasons except _________________.
sdas [7]

Answer:

the answer is D. they felt it would put them in competition with the North

Explanation:

it all revolved around agriculture for the south, more so than anything else

hope this helps :-)

4 0
3 years ago
John Locke believed that man without government was
anzhelika [568]
The answer is D.

Locke Defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. Lock says that people have rights, such as the rate of life, liberty, and property that I have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. He also said that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract or people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of the rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which answer choice BEST describes the structure of the section "Have we gotten better at studying the past"? A cause and effect
    9·1 answer
  • "Theodore c. Sorensen's memorandum, October 18, 1962." List the possible courses of action, including some advantages and disadv
    14·1 answer
  • Four major pilgrimage routes linked cities in France with the favorite shrine of Christian pilgrims, the cathedral of Santiago d
    9·1 answer
  • why did de Rubi choose to concentrate on protecting the land South of the Border line instead of trying to extend protection to
    9·2 answers
  • Jasmine took several different self-administered intelligence tests online yesterday and obtained scores of 124, 128, and 125. S
    6·1 answer
  • If a company has borrowed money that is accumulating interest, the income statement and balance sheet should be adjusted by reco
    13·2 answers
  • What were the most important reasons for Hitler being appointed chancellor?
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the removal of the Cherokee people from Georgia in the 1830s?
    10·2 answers
  • Did Alexander the great marry a Persian woman?
    9·2 answers
  • Pls help I will give 40POINTS
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!