Mao declared the Revolution over in 1969, but the Revolution's active phase would last until at least 1971, when Lin Biao, accused of a botched coup against Mao, fled and died in a plane crash.
<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
The correct answer is A) serving a committee.
The best method for a Senator to have power in making legislation is serving on a committee.
The Senator needs to be part of a Committee in Congress so he/she can have more power, influence, and express its ideas to be known by other Senators, congressmen, government officials, the Media, and the public.
The Senator can be part of these committees: Committee on Budget, Committee on Agriculture Nutrition and Forestry, Committee on Armed Service, Committee on Environment and Public Works, Committee on Foreign Relations, among many others.
I think it was <span> over who would control appointments of church officials, a conflict which is sometimes called the Investiture Controversy. Hope this was useful :P</span>
<span>promoting human rights is less important to American foreign policy than security concerns and economic interests.</span>
