We know that a peer group is loosely defined as a big set of peers who socialize with one another as a matter of opportunity. In other words, this a group that has the same interest, age, background, or social status. So for this question, Natalie's mom is right because teenagers exert both positive and negative influences on each other.
James thinks that julienne's poor marks are the result of insufficient studying. according to the law of "parsimony", the explanation that is more likely correct is "James's".
The law of parsimony is a critical thinking rule ascribed to William of Ockam who was a philosopher. It directs that a hypothesis ought to give the least complex or simplest conceivable (feasible) clarification for a phenomenon. Like in the given case the simplest explanation for not having good marks is that she did not study enough which is what James said.
Answer:
Hammurabi
Explanation:
Babylon became a major military power under Amorite king Hammurabi, who ruled from 1792 to 1750 B.C. After Hammurabi conquered neighboring city-states, he brought much of southern and central Mesopotamia under unified Babylonian rule, creating an empire called Babylonia.
Answer:
Europeans did not begin settling North America again until about 500 years later.
Explanation:
The question is phrased a little inaccurately because Greenland is technically in North America and the Norse peoples continued their colonization of Greenland for 500 years. This is significant I think because the question deals with Viking culture and presence in the North Atlantic. Christopher Columbus arrived in the Americas in 1492 (in the Caribbean region). The Viking site in Newfoundland is called L'Anse aux Meadows. There is debate about how long the site was occupied, with most scholars believing it was only occupied for a relatively short span of time as no burials have been found or other evidence of generations living at the site. Others think it might have been used more like a repair facility or outpost (Barraclough, 2016).
The best respond to this is that it is not advisable to let the child of the parents to take pharmacotherapy even if the child has autism. It is because it does not cause any effect in regards of treating autism and in the same time the child could only experience adverse effects that will result into complications.
