1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
12

What is not a reason to research and prepare some questions for the interviewer to answer?

English
2 answers:
SVETLANKA909090 [29]3 years ago
7 0
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The statement that it's a way to impress the interviewer with your expansive vocabulary is not a reason to <span>research and prepare some questions for the interviewer to answer. Hope this helps. Have a nice day.</span>
GaryK [48]3 years ago
7 0
D- it's a way to impress the interviewer with your expansive vocabulary. 
You might be interested in
7. Read the passage
babunello [35]
He is using an emotional aspect to pursue his audience to take real action.
4 0
2 years ago
Which phrase describes the partial meaning of the underlined word in this sentence? Not treating a wound properly can lead to in
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
The answer is The first ons
6 0
2 years ago
As soon as I saw her, I call her. into negative​
anzhelika [568]

love issues? are you okay?

5 0
2 years ago
5. PART A: What does the term "internalize" mean as used in
inna [77]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Should religious belief influence law,five paragraph argument.
konstantin123 [22]

Explanation:

Whatever we make of the substance of Judge Andrew Rutherford's ruling in the Cornish private hotel case, his citation of a striking and controversial opinion by Lord Justice Laws – delivered in another religious freedom case in 2010 – is worth pausing over. The owners of the Chymorvah hotel were found to have discriminated against a gay couple by refusing them a double-bedded room. They had appealed to their right to manifest their religious belief by running their hotel according to Christian moral standards. Given the drift of recent legal judgments in cases where equality rights are thought to clash with religious freedom rights, it is no surprise that the gay couple won their case.

But quite apart from the merits of the case, judges should be warned off any future reliance on the ill-considered opinions about law and religion ventured last year by Lord Justice Laws. Laws rightly asserted that no law can justify itself purely on the basis of the authority of any religion or belief system: "The precepts of any one religion – any belief system – cannot, by force of their religious origins, sound any louder in the general law than the precepts of any other."

A sound basis for this view is Locke's terse principle, in his Letter on Toleration, that "neither the right nor the art of ruling does necessarily carry with it the certain knowledge of other things; and least of all the true religion".

But Laws seemed to ground the principle instead on two problematic and potentially discriminatory claims. One is that the state can only justify a law on the grounds that it can be seen rationally and objectively to advance the general good (I paraphrase). The question is, seen by whom? What counts as rational, objective and publicly beneficial is not at all self-evident but deeply contested, determined in the cut and thrust of democratic debate and certainly not by the subjective views of individual judges. Religiously inspired political views – such as those driving the US civil rights movement of the 1960s or the Burmese Buddhists today – have as much right to enter that contest as any others. In this sense law can quite legitimately be influenced by religion.

Laws' other claim is that religious belief is, for all except the holder, "incommunicable by any kind of proof or evidence", and that the truth of it "lies only in the heart of the believer". But many non-Christians, for example, recognise that at least some of the claims of Christianity – historical ones, no doubt, or claims about universal moral values – are capable of successful communication to and critical assessment by others. Laws' assertion is also inconsistent with his own Anglican tradition, in which authority has never been seen as based on the subjective opinions of the individual but rather on the claims of "scripture, tradition and reason" acting in concert.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How can I use "whisker rose" in a comparing sentence with more or most.
    13·2 answers
  • In Fisher's article, the three pieces of evidence that he used to support his viewpoint on space travel to Mars were (fill this
    13·2 answers
  • How does Mr. Murry react when he is unable to rescue Charles Wallace and defeat IT right away? A. Mr. Murry says he believes he
    7·1 answer
  • Part A Read these sentences from "The Cask of Amontillado." "Ha! ha! ha!—he! he! he!—a very good joke indeed—an excellent jest.
    15·2 answers
  • (HALE goes outside. The SHERIFF follows the COUNTY ATTORNEYinto the other room. Then MRS HALE rises, hands tight together, looki
    9·1 answer
  • Read the sentences from Barrio Boy by Ernesto Galarza.
    11·2 answers
  • 22.6.2
    13·1 answer
  • Describe how Jews became refugees during world war 2? Please write a paragraph and in your own words. NO BOTS OR I WILL REPORT Y
    10·2 answers
  • Meaning of fight brewing right answer get brainlst
    11·1 answer
  • Decorative
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!