1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zimovet [89]
3 years ago
12

Based on this map, in which country might the population's tolerance for a variety of different religions be highest?https://cdn

.flvsgl.com/assessment_images/world_history_v12_gs-xml-/52288_514a3892/0500_g2_q2.gif

History
1 answer:
damaskus [11]3 years ago
3 0

The given map depicts Europe in the XVII century, based on the delimitations of the map we can conclude that the country with more religion tolerance would be the country located in an area where many different religions converge, and this would the <em>Balkan Peninsula</em>.

The Balkan Peninsula was part of the Ottoman Empire, and indeed, the Ottoman Empire accepted non-Muslim communities by recognizing their own religions and offering them protection under the Islamic tradition.  

You might be interested in
How many American Natives died as the result of the arrival of the Europeans? Why did they die?
goblinko [34]

Answer:

50-90%

Explanation:

The exact number is unknown but most of them died of dieses

3 0
3 years ago
Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla was liberated for his revolutionary behavior.
Dafna1 [17]

Answer:

Hey! Sorry, but this question is answered already. Here’s the link!

Explanation:

brainly.com/question/18226814

You’re welcome! :D

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which house ruled southern French kingdom of Navarre
sertanlavr [38]

Ruled the southern French kingdom of Navarre and stood next to Valois dynasty in the royal line of succession. Strongly opposed Huguenots; recruited and payed for large armies mostly from sections of northern and northwestern France.

4 0
2 years ago
PLEASE HELP I’LL GIVE BRAINLIST !!!!
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

No, the United States should not declare war.

Explanation:

If there was no reason to attack the U.S, then there is no reason to fight back. We shouldn't waste precious materials and money on something that could disappear just as soon as it started. If, and only if, they persist then we do have the right to defend ourselves. But the U.S should try to find the reason that they wanted to attack us for. There is no action without a reason. Then we could come to a conclusion on the subject.

This is only my opinion, so please don't think that your answer, or thinking should have to change.

3 0
3 years ago
How did Frederick Douglass use the Declaration of Independence to argue
Ludmilka [50]

Answer:

Its D

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did some of the townspeople dislike the universities?
    7·1 answer
  • ow did slave labor in the Southern colonies differ from that in the Middle and New England colonies? Slaves worked fewer hours i
    8·1 answer
  • High best explains why banks consider interest on loans to be imported ?
    13·1 answer
  • Is the legislative branch or the judiciary the appropriate place for rights to be articulated and promoted? Explain why.
    5·1 answer
  • Sec 1 Causes of WW1 Quiz (assignment 10.3)
    12·1 answer
  • In the movie October Sky, Homer tells his dad that Dr. Wernher von Braun is not his hero. Who was Homer's hero? Why?
    7·1 answer
  • In what year did James 1 become King of England?
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement best completes the diagram
    12·2 answers
  • Please kindly help in fully explaining the 5 notable vegetations in Africa?​
    10·1 answer
  • What was the triggering event for the united states to join world war 1?.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!