Answer: $54,000 per production run
Explanation:
As we are dealing with the decision of whether or not to process the good further, the irrelevant cost would be the cost of producing product B from input R.
This is because this cost has already been incurred to produce product B and so is a sunk cost. Sunk costs are irrelevant to the decision to process further.
30,000 units of B were made from 90,000 units R so the cost of B is:
= 30,000 / 50,000 * 90,000
= $54,000
<em />
<em>The options here are probably for a variant of this question.</em>
Answer:
B. lower than
Explanation:
As orange has a positive externality which cannot be included in the cost, the social optimal will be lower. That's because, neither the consumer will pay to benefit the entire society a higher price than their marginal utility or the producer produce when marginal cost exceed the marginal revenue
The government should try to subsidize the market to allow for a hiher quantity of organge an achieve the socially optinal quantity.
Increase the quantity demanded by about 25 percent.
<h3>What is the short definition of price elasticity?</h3>
- Price elasticity in business and economics refers to how much people, consumers, or producers alter their demand or the quantity supplied in reaction to changes in price or income.
- It is mostly used to evaluate how consumer demand has changed as a result of a price change for a good or service.
<h3>What are some examples of price elasticity of demand?</h3>
- When a price increase results in a greater percentage reduction in demand, we say a good is price elastic.
- For instance, if price increases 20% and demand declines 50%, the PED equals -2.5. One illustration is Heinz soup. Heinz soup options are plenty today.
learn more about price elasticity of demand here
<u>brainly.com/question/5078326</u>
#SPJ4
Answer:
$15,300
Explanation:
GDP = Consumption + Investment spending + Government Spending + Net Export
Net Export = export - import
=$9,000 + $3,000 + $3,500 + ($2500 - $2700) = $15,300
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
c. $12,000
Explanation:
In this question, we assume the Fred and Wilma divorced in year i.e before 2019. Since in the question, it is given that the Fred paid $6,000 Wilma and $6,000 directly to the Law school Wilma is attending i.e not related to the child
Both payments are related to Wilma so we consider these payments and reflects the received payment which equals to
= $6,000 + $6,000
= $12,000
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
