3 years ago

Solve the Quadratic Equation.

Mathematics

1 answer:

vichka [17]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

x = ± 2i

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation has no real roots, gut has complex roots

Given

x² = - 4 ( take the square root of both sides )

x = ± $\sqrt{-4}$

= ± $\sqrt{4(-1)}$

[ Note that $\sqrt{-1}$ = i ]

= ± $\sqrt{4}$ × $\sqrt{-1}$ = ± 2i

You might be interested in

Solve the equation. Round to the nearest hundredth. Show work.

muminat

Answer:

Final answer is approx x=0.16.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given equation is $2.8\times 13^{4x} +4.8 = 19.3$

Now we need to solve equation $2.8\times 13^{4x} +4.8 = 19.3$ and round to the nearest hundredth.

$2.8\times 13^{4x} +4.8 = 19.3$

$2.8\times 13^{4x} = 19.3-4.8$

$2.8\times 13^{4x} = 14.5$

$13^{4x} = \frac{14.5}{2.8}$

$13^{4x} = 5.17857142857$

$\log(13^{4x}) = \log(5.17857142857)$

$4x \log(13) = \log(5.17857142857)$

$4x = \frac{\log(5.17857142857)}{\log\left(13\right)}$

$4x = 0.641154659628$

$x = \frac{0.641154659628}{4}$

$x = 0.160288664907$

Round to the nearest hundredth.

Hence final answer is approx x=0.16.

4 0

3 years ago

Im taking a test & i don’t understand can someone help

Shtirlitz [24]

62 units hope this helps

4 0

3 years ago

Gary took 7 hours to mow 4 lawns,then at that rate, how many lawns could be mowed in 35 hours? Write a different question plz

Svetach [21]

Answer:

The total amount of lawns to be mowed would be 20 in 35 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

It takes an hour and 45 minutes to mow one lawn. When you multiply the 7 hours by 5 you get 35 hours. Same thing if you multiply the 4 lawns by 5 you get 20 lawns.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Svensons find a refrigerator valued at $2,300 on sale for $1,900. They decided to withdraw $500 from savings to

Flura [38]

Answer:

The Svensons' assets increased by $1,800.

Step-by-step explanation:

I just took the quiz!

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help Me With These <br> #Geometry

Damm [24]

They are mad as easy try it on your own your answer is suppose to be 80

5 0

3 years ago