Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

15

Which inequality statement describes the two numbers on a number line? "16 and a number 10 units to the left of 16" A) 6 > 16

B) 6 < 16 C) 10 < 16 D) 10 > 16

1 answer:

Ivenika [448]3 years ago

4 0

The answer is c because the two numbers on a number line 16 will be greater then 10

You might be interested in

So this is wrong ? How do i fix it

Inga [223]

I think the 57 is an whole number.

5 0

4 years ago

Evaluate 156 divided by(8x+14)when x=8 i am only in 6th grade be nice

VikaD [51]

So first we have to find out what the bottom number is so

8x+14
subsitute 8 for x
8(8)+14
64+14
78

so 156/78
an easy way to do this is to factor it out and find the 'ones' like 4/8=1/2 times 4/4 (4/4=1 and can be canceled out)
*=times
156=2*2*3*13
78=2*3*13

so (2*2*3*13)/(2*3*13)
2/1 times (2*3*13)/(2*3*13)
we can cross out the (2*3*13) and get
2 as the answer

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

At school, the maximum number of students that can be in a classroom is 25. If there are 20 students signed up for the chemistry

Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

if a book cost 13.56 and its been 2 years since turned in and the fine is 0.05 a day how much would it be now

Gala2k [10]

I think it is $50.06.
I used a calculator for this.

Hope this helps! :)

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Seth invested n dollars into an investment fund last year. After a period of one year, the value of his investment can be repres

Crank

Answer: A. The value of his investment decreased by 16% during this time period.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here the initial amount = n

Final amount after 1 years = 0.84n

The total change in the initial amount = n - 0.84n = 0.16 n

$\text{ The percentage change in the initial amount} = \frac{\text{ the total change in initial amount}}{\text{ Initial amount}}\times 100$

= $\frac{0.16 n }{n} \times 100 = 16\%$

Thus, the amount is decreases by 16% in one year,

⇒ Option A is correct.

3 0

3 years ago