This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law
Answer:
C. concerned with uniqueness
Explanation:
Competing on differentiation refers to the strategic tactic employed by a company to make it's brand unique and as a result set it apart from those of its competitors. In this way a company aims to acquire market share by producing "different" products or services from the ones it's competitors are producing. This ensures that their customers are able to identify their products and appeal to it differently(positively) from other products in the market.
The correct answer is that they only take make-up exams and nothing else that might not be a part of their job. They don't have to take exams on things that are not related in any way to make-up or the make-up industry or similar things. It's only for those who are into make-up.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Those who differed from or dissented from the dominant religion often face mistreatment
