All categories

3 years ago

A. (1.34)(5.46) = (1.76)(x)

1 answer:

6 0

We are given an equation with an unknown variable x. We can find the value of x by dividing both sides by 1.76, as this will leave only x on the right hand side of the equation and its value on the left hand side, as shown below:

$(1.34)(5.46)=1.76(x) \\ \\ 
 \frac{(1.34)(5.46)}{1.76} = \frac{1.76(x)}{1.76} \\ \\ 
 \frac{(1.34)(5.46)}{1.76} =x \\ \\ 
4.16=x$

Thus solving the given equation, we get x =4.16, rounded of to nearest hundredth.

You might be interested in

5. Xian plans to run 14 laps around a track Each lap is 400 yards. So farxian has run 1,680 yards around the track. What percent

Igoryamba

1,680 divided by 400 = 4.2
So we know that Xian has done 4.2 laps.
4.2 divided by 14 = 0.3
0.3 x 100 = 30%
Therefore, Xian has finished 30% of the run

6 0

3 years ago

Hi boys can you help me pls!!!!!!!

goblinko [34]

Answer: OPTION A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following function:

$h(x)=-\frac{1}{4}x^2+\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{1}{2}$

You know that it represents the the height of the ball (in meters) when it is a distance "x" meters away from Rowan.

Since it is a Quadratic function its graph is parabola.

So, the maximum point of the graph modeling the height of the ball is the Vertex of the parabola.

You can find the x-coordinate of the Vertex with this formula:

$x=\frac{-b}{2a}$

In this case:

$a=-\frac{1}{4}\\\\b=\frac{1}{2}$

Then, substituting values, you get:

$x=\frac{-\frac{1}{2}}{(2)(-\frac{1}{4}))}\\\\x=1$

Finally, substitute the value of "x" into the function in order to get the y-coordinate of the Vertex:

$h(1)=y=-\frac{1}{4}(1)^2+\frac{1}{2}(1)+\frac{1}{2}\\\\y=0.75$

Therefore, you can conclude that:

<em> The maximum height of the ball is 0.75 of a meter, which occurs when it is approximately 1 meter away from Rowan.</em>

7 0

3 years ago

A scale drawing of Coriane's bedroom floor is shown

Pie

Answer:

answer is yes it does have some fun and easy way out

8 0

2 years ago

True or false? To begin an indirect proof, you assume the converse of what you intend to prove is true.

djyliett [7]

Answer:

The statement is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

To begin an indirect proof, you assume the converse of what you intend to prove is true. This is false.

Rather the correct answer is that to begin an indirect proof, you assume the inverse of what you intend to prove is true.

The converse can be either true or false, depending on what the original statement is, so assuming the converse is pointless.

4 0

3 years ago

Simplify 5 square root of 11 end root minus 12 square root of 11 end root minus 2 square root of 11. negative 33 square root of

Alla [95]

As long as your indexes are the same (which they are; they are all square roots) and you radicands are the same (which they are; they are all 11), then you can add or subtract. The rules for adding and subtracting radicals are more picky than multiplying or dividing. Just like adding fractions or combining like terms. Since all the square roots are the same we only have to worry about the numbers outside. In fact, it may help to factor out the sqrt 11: $(5-12-2) \sqrt{11}$ . The numbers subtract to give you -9. Therefore, the simplification is $-9 \sqrt{11}$

6 0

2 years ago