Answer:
d
Explanation:
The question needs more detail to be answered...at least by me:-(
Answer is the threat of substitute products or services.
Rivalry among the existing competitors was not a significant factor in the BlackBerry's downfall because they were not able to produce any form of alternative to the iPhone, and the users switched from the BlackBerry phones to the iPhones. The danger of replacement products is one of the Porter's five factors, and it indicates that there are alternative items that are likely to steal the company's market share. The downfall of the BlackBerry was caused by the substitute product in the shape of the iPhone.
All of the other allegations are untrue because there were no new entrants and the suppliers threatened because they were unable to upgrade their product.
Therefore, (B) Threat of substitute products or services is the correct answer is the correct answer.
To know more about porter five forces analysis click here:
brainly.com/question/15059432
#SPJ4
Answer:
true water and the other day and the other
Answer:Consumer Price Index (CPI) 2016 = 111.54
Explanation:
consumer price index is a measure of price change over a period of time in other words consumer price index is a measure of inflation. A number of good are selected and their prices are monitored each year in order to measured against the base year prices in order to determine changes in the general price level.
The goods selected represent the spending patterns of the an average consumer in that economy or country. When the price of these goods rise over time when compared to the Basket Cost of the base year we can assume that there is a rise in the general price level
Base year = 2014
Basket's cost 2014= $52
Base cost 2016 = $58
Consumer Price index (CPI) 2016 = Basket costs 2016/base year Basket cost 2014.
Consumer Price index (CPI) 2016 = 58/52 = 1.115384615 x 100
Consumer Price Index (CPI) 2016 = 111.5384615
Consumer Price Index (CPI) 2016 = 111.54
Answer:
c. $12,000
Explanation:
In this question, we assume the Fred and Wilma divorced in year i.e before 2019. Since in the question, it is given that the Fred paid $6,000 Wilma and $6,000 directly to the Law school Wilma is attending i.e not related to the child
Both payments are related to Wilma so we consider these payments and reflects the received payment which equals to
= $6,000 + $6,000
= $12,000
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it