The solution to this system set is: "x = 4" , "y = 0" ; or write as: [4, 0] . ________________________________________________________ Given: ________________________________________________________ y = - 4x + 16 ;
4y − x + 4 = 0 ; ________________________________________________________ "Solve the system using substitution" . ________________________________________________________ First, let us simplify the second equation given, to get rid of the "0" ;
→ 4y − x + 4 = 0 ;
Subtract "4" from each side of the equation ;
→ 4y − x + 4 − 4 = 0 − 4 ;
→ 4y − x = -4 ; ________________________________________________________ So, we can now rewrite the two (2) equations in the given system: ________________________________________________________
y = - 4x + 16 ; ===> Refer to this as "Equation 1" ;
4y − x = -4 ; ===> Refer to this as "Equation 2" ; ________________________________________________________ Solve for "x" and "y" ; using "substitution" : ________________________________________________________ We are given, as "Equation 1" ;
→ " y = - 4x + 16 " ; _______________________________________________________ → Plug in this value for [all of] the value[s] for "y" into {"Equation 2"} ;
to solve for "x" ; as follows: _______________________________________________________ Note: "Equation 2" :
→ " 4y − x = - 4 " ; _________________________________________________ Substitute the value for "y" {i.e., the value provided for "y"; in "Equation 1}" ; for into the this [rewritten version of] "Equation 2" ; → and "rewrite the equation" ;
→ as follows: _________________________________________________
→ " 4 (-4x + 16) − x = -4 " ; _________________________________________________ Note the "distributive property" of multiplication : _________________________________________________
a(b + c) = ab + ac ; AND:
a(b − c) = ab <span>− ac . _________________________________________________ As such: We have: </span> → " 4 (-4x + 16) −x = - 4 " ; _________________________________________________ AND: → "4 (-4x + 16) " = (4* -4x) + (4 *16) = " -16x + 64 " ; _________________________________________________ Now, we can write the entire equation: → " -16x + 64− x = - 4 " ; Note: " - 16x − x = -16x − 1x = -17x " ; → " -17x + 64 = - 4 " ; Solve for "x" ;
Subtract "64" from EACH SIDE of the equation:
→ " -17x + 64 − 64 = - 4 − 64 " ;
to get:
→ " -17x = -68 " ;
Divide EACH side of the equation by "-17" ; to isolate "x" on one side of the equation; & to solve for "x" ;
→ -17x / -17 = -68/ -17 ;
to get:
→ x = 4 ; ______________________________________ Now, Plug this value for "x" ; into "{Equation 1"} ;
which is: " y = -4x + 16" ; to solve for "y". ______________________________________
→ y = -4(4) + 16 ;
= -16 + 16 ;
→ y = 0 . _________________________________________________________ The solution to this system set is: "x = 4" , "y = 0" ; or write as: [4, 0] . _________________________________________________________ Now, let us check our answers—as directed in this very question itself ; _________________________________________________________ → Given the TWO (2) originally given equations in the system of equation; as they were originally rewitten; → Let us check;
→ For EACH of these 2 (TWO) equations; do these two equations hold true {i.e. do EACH SIDE of these equations have equal values on each side} ; when we "plug in" our obtained values of "4" (for "x") ; and "0" for "y" ??? ;
→ Consider the first equation given in our problem, as originally written in the system of equations:
→ " y = - 4x + 16 " ;
→ Substitute: "4" for "x" and "0" for "y" ; When done, are both sides equal?
{Actually, that is how we obtained our value for "y" initially.}.
→ Now, let us check the other equation given—as originally written in this very question:
→ " 4y − x + 4 = ?? 0 ??? " ;
→ Let us "plug in" our obtained values into the equation;
{that is: "4" for the "x-value" ; & "0" for the "y-value" ;
→ to see if the "other side of the equation" {i.e., the "right-hand side"} holds true {i.e., in the case of this very equation—is equal to "0".}.
→ " 4(0) − 4 + 4 = ? 0 ?? " ;
→ " 0 − 4 + 4 = ? 0 ?? " ;
→ " - 4 + 4 = ? 0 ?? " ; Yes! _____________________________________________________ → As such, from "checking [our] answer (obtained values)" , we can be reasonably certain that our answer [obtained values] : _____________________________________________________ → "x = 4" and "y = 0" ; or; write as: [0, 4] ; are correct. _____________________________________________________ Hope this lenghty explanation is of help! Best wishes! _____________________________________________________
When two lines are parallel, all four angles formed by the intersection of the two lines are right angles, meaning their angle measures are (90°). This means that alternate interior angles are congruent because all alternate interior angles measures equal (90°). Therefore, by the alternate interior angles converse theorem, lines () and () are parallel.
The alternate interior angles converse theorem states if two angles are congruent and they have the relation of being a part of two lines intersected by a third line, then the two non-intersecting lines are parallel.