Answer: Decrease and Increase
Explanation:
According to the Mundell–Fleming model, in an economy with flexible exchange rates, expansionary fiscal policy will cause the net exports to decrease. Expansionary fiscal policy shifts the IS curve rightwards, as a result BOP surplus created in the economy. So, exchange rate decreases to shift the BOP back to its initial position. As a result of lower exchange rate, exports falls. Hence, net exports decreases.
Expansionary Monetary policy will cause the net exports to increases. Expansionary Monetary policy shifts the LM curve rightwards, as a result BOP deficit created in the economy. So, exchange rate increases to shift the BOP back to its initial position. As a result of higher exchange rate, exports increases. Hence, net exports increases.
Answer: $30,000
Explanation:
In accounting, the treatment of the Sale and Operating Leaseback operation is such that a gain is only recognized if the sales price is more than the fair value. In such a case the difference between the fair value and the carrying price is considered the Gain on Sale.
The Difference between the sales price and the fair value is to be amortized over the period of use.
Seeing as the selling price is more than the fair value, the Gain on Sale is therefore,
= Fair Value - Carrying Value
= 310,000 - 280,000
= $30,000
$30,000 is the amount of gain on sale of the property recognized by Alla on January 1, Year 1.
Answer: C. 0.3
Explanation: The Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) usually expressed as percentage of total daily intake of energy is defined as the range of intakes for a particular energy source (protein, fat, carbohydrate etc) that is associated with reduced risk of chronic disease while providing adequate intakes of essential nutrients required by the body. For proteins this is within the range of 10 to 35%, expressed as fraction, 0.1 to 0.35. Option C falls within this range and therefore is the correct answer.
The study of an agent's or individual's decisions is known as decision theory. The official decision-making process concludes with evaluation. Evaluating the consequences may assist the decision-maker in learning lessons that will help her make better decisions in the future.
- Loss aversion is the correct answer because the general notion of the "loss-aversion" theory is that if an individual is provided with two equal alternatives, one of which is presented in terms of prospective profits and the other in terms of potential losses, the former option will be chosen.
- Loss aversion is a cognitive bias or psychological phenomenon that explains why the agony of losing is twice as powerful psychologically as the pleasure of winning.
Therefore, representativeness, cognitive bias, and overconfidence are not factors relative to an arbitrary decision distortion. So, Loss aversion is the correct response to the question.
For more information regarding arbitrary baseline, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/11224360
Answer:
Investment revenue = $52,000
Explanation:
Since Puff uses the equity method, the original journal entry to record the purchase of 40% of the shares should have been:
Dr Investment in Straw 400,000
Cr Cash 400,000
After one year, Straw earned $150,000 in net income, but it also had equipment with a fair market value higher than carrying value also depreciable by $100,000. So the net income must be adjusted = $150,000 - ($100,000 x 20%) = $130,000. The journal entry to record the adjusted income should be ($130,000 x 40%):
Dr Investment in Straw 52,000
Cr Investment revenue 52,000
