The answer is the first one A country can make and sell goods affordably and buy goods that it is inefficient at making. ♡
Just tell what it means to you.
Answer:
Basically, Native Americans viewed land as something that was to be used communally by all the ... This view of land ownership can be seen in a speech given by the Indian leader.
Explanation: finished this assesesment.
A craze is an exciting mass involvement that lasts for a relatively long period.
Riots, Panics and Crazes, Rumor, Fads and Fashions, and Mass Hysteria are the five types of collective behavior.
A craze is "mobilization for action based on positive wish-fulfillment belief," in contrast to panic (Smelser, 1963). There is a haste to find some fulfillment. Examples of crazes are offered, including manias, booms, and fads. But it differs from a fad in that its adherents turn it into an obsession. A craze is defined as "an exhilarating mass involvement that lasts for a relatively lengthy amount of time" by Lofland (1981). Smelser (1962) uses the comparison of objects that attract and those that repel those who are influenced to contrast crazes with panic attacks.
Learn more about collective behavior here:
brainly.com/question/14385803
#SPJ4
Rule of Law - For a defendant not present within the territory of a forum to be subjected to a judgment in persona, due process requires that he have certain minimum contacts with the forum such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
<span>Reasoning - A state may subject a corporation to in personam jurisdiction where the corporation has such minimum contacts with the state as to make it reasonable to require the corporation to defend a suit there. A corporation is deemed to be "present" in a state for jurisdiction purposes when the activities of the corporation in that state have been continuous and systematic. Due process is violated where a state makes a binding judgment in personam against an individual or corporate defendant with which the state has no contacts, ties, or relations. However, to the extent that a corporation exercises the privilege of conducting activities within a state, giving rise to certain obligations, it is not unduly burdensome to require a corporation to respond to a suit brought within the state to enforce those obligations. In the present case, International Shoe's activities in Washington were systematic and continuous and resulted in a large volume of interstate business. Indeed, the obligation upon which this suit is based arose out of those activities. International Shoe employed salesmen who resided in Washington, whose principal activities were confined to the state, and who were compensated by commissions based on sales. These salesmen occasionally rented at International Shoe's expense rooms in hotels or business buildings within the state for exhibiting samples. It is clear that these activities establish sufficient contacts with Washington, to make it reasonable, under traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice, to permit the state to enforce the obligations which International Shoe has incurred there. The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed. Which that is your answer</span>