Answer:
secondary sex characteristics
Explanation:
A human has two sexual characteristics primary and secondary.
The primary characteristics are sex chromosomes, gonads, level of sex hormones, anatomy of internal genitalia and anatomy of external genitalia. They are present at birth.
The secondary sex characteristics are breasts, menstrual cycle and accumulation of fat in certain parts of the body which gives rise to the hourglass body form for women.
For men they develop a deeper voice, increase in height and weight.
Pubic hair grows in both sexes.
They develop when a person attains puberty.
Hence, Harrison's secondary sex characteristics were developed.
Answer:
The correct statment would be: "the hormons of the endocrine system exert their action by lock and key mechanism."
Explanation:
The endoncrine system is responsable of the release of hormons under certain conditions, and in different organs, they go trough the bloodstream. The lock and key mechanism is explained as how the receptors block or release hormonos or instead they don´t. The endocrine system is responsable for the reproductive system, and regulates metabolic processes.
Lighting hitting water. I can give an explanation if needed
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
