It is false that the Taylor’s 3 stores of atrocities reveal that it is not the intentions behind them, but what really count are the dreadful consequences of these acts. In actuality, it is the opposite of this statement that is true, therefore, what really counts are the intentions behind the acts.
Answer:
it is very difficult to discover and determine all possible consequences is the correct answer.
Explanation:
In many ways, the two notions are at odds. Or, at least, mild conflict.
Free Market Capitalism is an economic system understands that some will succeed and others will not. People will be rewarded for their ingenuity and market acumen and bad ideas will be disregarded and rejected.
American Democracy (Democratic-Republic) is defined by citizens banding together to solve common problems, while reserving the right of private property and concepts of liberty.
So, as free market capitalism has expanded in periods of history, Democracy has often taken a hit. As collective Democratic ideals have expanded, free market ideals have declined.
The New Deal is common understood as a retraction of the free market and the expansion of American collective Democracy. We are currently in a period of struggle between free market capitalism and strong collective Democracy. Only time will tell which concept will prevail.
Answer:
Accommodation
Explanation:
Accommodation: The term accommodation is given by one of the famous psychologist Jean Piaget. He described the process that occurs when new experience or information causes a person to modify his or her existing schemas. Instead of making the new experience or information fit into an existing or already present schema, the person changes the schema to accommodate the new experience or information.
Example:
For a girl, a horse is a four-legged animal, huge, and having a long tail. The first time when she sees a cow, the girl calls it a horse because that fits in with the girl's current schema.
Answer: Alvin Platinga
Explanation:
Alvin Platinga argues that free will is only possible if God allows both good and evil to happen.
If man can make his or her own choices freely, then those choices cannot be known to God in advance..
If all man's choices are known to an ominiscient God, then those choices have already been made and are not a result of free will.
If a man has free will, then he or she has power over them and therefore God is not omnipotent.
According to this reading, God is either omnipotent and omniscient or there is free will
