All right.
Differences with the Historical Model:
1. That model shows the planet's orbits as perfect circles, not ellipses.
<span>2. Aristotle believed in a geocentric (Earth centered) solar system, while it actually is heliocentric Sun centered). </span>
<span>3. That model didn't show all the planets we know today, such as Neptune, Uranus, etc. </span>
<span>4. A lot of that model was based on religious beliefs.
</span>Differences with Modern Model:
1. Our model shows the orbits as ellipses.
<span>2. Our model shows a heliocentric solar system. </span>
<span>3. Our model shows all the planets we know today. </span>
<span>4. Our model has nothing to do with religion.
</span>Similarities Between Both Models:
1. They both are based on the same solar system.
<span>2. They both show the inner planets, the Moon, the Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn. </span>
<span>3. The both were made by many observations of the sky.
</span>
Hope this helps.:b
Surprisingly chocolate actually contains a fair amount of iron. Red meats are known to contain iron, one thing in particular is blood (yes that is sometimes eaten, and it contains a lot of iron). Such organs of animals that are high in iron include the spleen and or marrow.
If you wish to go vegetarian red veggies tend to be high in iron, one in particular are beets (yes, i know, they aren't red until processed)
hypothesis can be reject or wrong because it's what somone thinks as a theory also it aslo cannot be proven correctly
and it aslo has to he tested many times
Wind energy
Hydro power energy
Geothermal energy
Solar energy
<span>In the "all or none" law of muscle contraction, it states that when the stimulus applied exceeds threshold then the the nerve sending signals to a few muscle fibers will give a complete response; contraction. Graded response is dependent on how many motor units have been recruited. The more motor units, the greater the force in the contraction.</span>
