By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Answer:
The film isn't as good as the book
Explanation:
I have no idea I’m just answering to get points. Ihope this helped in some way.
The answer is B. I have had this question before.
Rosa Parks explains this so that <span>so people will know why she chose not to give up her seat to a white person. It</span> was not so that other people feel sorry for her, but so that they understand her decision.
