Answer and Explanation:
The disagreement arise between this economist is due to the differences in the scientific judgements as they disagree due to the various scientific judgements. And, despite their differences, the proposition of two economists should be chosen at random as the tariff and import quotas normally decreased the economic welfare as it always result in deadweight loss and in this both economist should be agree for the same
Answer:
$1,692
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Number of shares purchased = 100
Cost of stock = $30 per share
Commission = $29
Selling price per share = $45
Commission for selling = $29
Earned dividends = $2.50 per share
Now,
Total Return
= Number of Shares × (Sale Price - cost + Total dividends) - Total Commissions
or
Total Return = 100 × ($45 - $30 + $2.50) - (2 × $29)
or
Total Return = $1750 - $58
or
Total Return = $1,692
Answer:
Price elasticity of demand shows how much a 1% change in the price of a good or services changes the quantity demanded.
In the short run, a 10% increase in price decreases quantity demanded by 4%
PED short run = % change in price / % change in quantity = 4% / 10% = 0.4
PED long run = % change in price / % change in quantity = 7.5% / 10% = 0.75
Both PEDs are inelastic since they are less than 1, which means that an increase in price will result in a proportionally smaller decrease in the quantity demanded. But the PED in the long run is less inelastic, which means that an increase in price will decrease the quantity demanded more in the long than in the short run.
This happens because smokes consider that cigarettes are a basic necessity, so they are willing to purchase them even if the price increases. But as time passes (long run), more smokers will consider that it is not worth paying that much for cigarettes and will probably quit smoking or at least reduce the number of cigarettes they smoke per day.
Answer:
Decrease in the interest rate
Explanation:
Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows
let me use an example to illustrate
the present value of $100 in year 0 discounted at 6% = $100
the present value of $100 one year from now discounted at 6% = $94.33
the present value of $100 two years from now discounted at 6% = $89
We can see that present value decreases with an increase in time
2. the present value of $100 one year from now discounted at 6% = $94.33
the present value of $90 one year from now discounted at 6% = $84.91
We can see that present value decreases with a decrease in the future value.
3. the present value of $100 one year from now discounted at 6% = $94.33
the present value of $100 one year from now discounted at 5% = $95.24
We can see that the lower the discount rate, the higher the present value
The Correct Awnser is (A) because when you do the math, thats what you come up with
