1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MakcuM [25]
3 years ago
9

Help me with this ASAP PLEASE

Mathematics
1 answer:
xxMikexx [17]3 years ago
5 0
It is the first one
You might be interested in
After 4 minutes of reading, Aaron was on page 14 of his book. After 8 minutes he was on page 20. Which equation models the page
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

  1. 4×14=56
  2. 8×20=160
  3. 160×56=8960
3 0
2 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
2 years ago
What two numbers multiplied equal -9 but add up to -6
jeka94
No numbers, is the question correct? Are you factoring?
4 0
2 years ago
Rozlyn invested $2000 in an account that pays 4.25% annual simple interest. She will not make any additional deposits or withdra
PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

$850

Step-by-step explanation:

Interest = Principal x Rate x Time

I = 2000(.0425)(10)

I = 850

3 0
3 years ago
Graph the line that passes through the points (9, -9) and (9,−4) and determine the equation of the line.
yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

x = 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Since both points share the same x-coordinate, look no further.

It has to be a vertical line with x-coordinate 9.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Would 50% of a negative number be greater in value or less in value than the number itself? Give an example as part of your expl
    15·2 answers
  • 15,614+?=68,025 <br> What is the total
    12·1 answer
  • Smart people. Please click here. I attached a pic of the problem
    13·1 answer
  • Help please it is due in 10 min<br> will give brinly
    8·2 answers
  • PLZ HELP!! I NEED ASAP
    6·1 answer
  • What fraction is equal to 50% of 1/4?
    9·1 answer
  • Which represents the solution set to the inequality 5.1(3 + 2.2x) &gt; –14.25 – 6(1.7x + 4)?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help me on this. Thanks
    11·1 answer
  • Which numerical expression is obtained by substituting x= 2, y= 6,
    9·1 answer
  • What is the volume of this object?<br> Top View<br> 2u<br> 2u<br><br><br><br> pls I need help lol
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!