To check if an improper fraction like like 24/7 can still be simplified, you have to find similar factors that can divide both the numerator (24) and the denominator (7). However in this case, there are no longer any common factors that can divide both of them. However, improper fractions can be represented in a mixed fraction form.
A mixed fraction is made up of a whole number and a fraction. To change an improper fraction to a mixed fraction, divide the numerator by the denominator. The quotient should be a whole number and a remainder. The whole number in the quotient would be the whole number in the mixed fraction, and the remainder would be the numerator.
In the case of 24/7, dividing it would yield us 3 remainder 3. Therefore, the mixed fraction would be:
3 3/7
Answer:
408 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
Given in the question that,
length of a show box = 15 in
width of a show box = 7 in
height of a show box = 4.5 in
Formula to calculate the surface area of shoe box is as following
<h3> 2*(L*W + L*H + W*H) </h3>
Plug values in the formula
2*(15*7 + 15*4.5 + 7*4.5)
2(105 + 67.5 + 31.5)
408 in²
The surface area of the box = 408 in²
Answer:
3x + 16 + 30/x - 13
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
An = 21n
Step-by-step explanation:
Each number of bacteria = 21 * the values. OF THE HOUR.
Answer:
Hasty generalization fallacy
Step-by-step explanation:
Fallacy can be said to be a reasoning which leads to the wrong interpretation of a statement or an argument. Although some people intentionally make fallacious statements just to score cheap points or to please the listening audience, but some make fallacious unknowingly, either due to carelessness or by being lackadaisical.
In this case the writer, without enough investigation and proof, comes to a very hasty conclusion that "all doctors are the same". This is termed a hasty conclusion because the writer only had dealings with just two docotors(Dr. Ames and Dr. Collins). So saying all doctors are the same just because of two instance is a rather rash statement.
Therefore, the fallacy commited by the writer here is a fallacy of hasty generalization.
Hasty generalization fallacy occurs when someone has a limited information on a population but makes a conclusion based on a larger population than he/she should.
