For these models there are methods such as the perturbation method which can<span> be used to find an approximate analytical solution within a certain range. The </span>advantage<span> here over a </span>numerical<span> solution is that </span>you<span> end up with an equation (</span><span>instead of just a long list of numbers) which </span>you can<span> gain some insight from.</span>
Answer:
9in
Step-by-step explanation:
radius is half the diameter
18/2 is 9 so the radius is 9in
Answer:
first option
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
f(x) = 
← factorise the numerator
= 
← cancel (x + 4) on numerator/ denominator
= 2x - 3
Cancelling (x + 4) creates a discontinuity ( a hole ) at x + 4 = 0, that is
x = - 4
Substitute x = - 4 into the simplified f(x) for y- coordinate
f(- 4) = 2(- 4) - 3 = - 8 - 3 = - 11
The discontinuity occurs at (- 4, - 11 )
To obtain the zero let f(x) = 0, that is
2x - 3 = 0 ⇒ 2x = 3 ⇒ x = 
There is a zero at ( , 0 )
Thus
discontinuity at (- 4, - 11 ), zero at ( , 0 )
34/85%=34/0.85=40
So that's your answer.
Answer:
29
Step-by-step explanation:
Well "value" of 3x^2 - 7x + 9 when x = 4 is just x plugged into the expression
3 * 4^2 - 7 * 4 + 9
3 * 16 - 28 + 9
= 29
