In the "person-situation debate" amongst psychologists, Traits are a false notion. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be beneficial to examine how they respond differently in particular circumstances.
<h3>Which side of the person-situation argument did Mischel take?</h3>
In the psychological community's "person-situation argument," Walter Mischel played a significant role. Character traits are a myth. People might not behave consistently in all circumstances, thus it would be useful to examine the various responses in particular circumstances.
<h3>What exactly is the person-situation argument?</h3>
Nature versus. nurture argument in personality psychology concerns which factor, a person or an environment, is more crucial in predicting what people will do. There is too much variation in behavior across contexts for attributes to adequately describe individual variations.
Learn more about psychologists here:-
brainly.com/question/28321133
#SPJ4
Where is the question so I can answer
Answer: C:19
Explanation: You subtract 15 from 34
Answer:
E. South Asia's population mostly lives in the countryside as farmers. Western Europe's population mostly lives in large cities.
Explanation:
Based on the information from the World Bank, about 70% of people living in South Asia have about the third quarter of the population living on agriculture and stays in rural areas. There is about 36% urban ratio in South Asia, with 303 people per square kilometers.
On the other hand, the urban ratio in Western Europe is about 79.8%, with a population density of 181 people per square kilometers.
Hence, in this case, the right answer is Option E. South Asia's population mostly lives in the countryside as farmers. Western Europe's population mostly lives in large cities.
