Answer:Both Is the evidence sufficient to support the speaker's claims? and Is the evidence relevant to the speaker's claims?
Explanation:
Before one can make a claim there should be enough evidence to support that claim otherwise it could sound just like their own opinion or views on the matter that they are discussing .
Sufficient claim can or will give viewers or listeners the factual information about what one is claiming which may make persuasion more effective .
People are more likely to believe something and be convinced about it as long as there is sufficient evidence to support it and they can see how the evidence is linked or related to the claim .
Otherwise if the evidence doesn't relate to the claim then it can not be taken as an evidence for that particular claim and people can easily dismiss that claim.
I believe the answer is Paul Tillich
According to Tillich, humans are creatures that would always experience concerns from various aspects of our live (money, relationship, etc)
He believed that religion is a form of ultimate concern because it requires you to do total surrender to an entity that you've never met before.
A quarter is a fourth of something. In this case a quarter is a fourth of an hour. An hour is 60 minutes, and a fourth of that is 15 minutes (60 divided by 4).
So quarter past 3 is 3:15
<span>The babysitter would only experience an emotion after seeing what the stimulus was about and making an appraisal of that stimulus, which would occur by checking to see what caused the door to make such a noise. If the door was making a noise because of a positive reason, such as the parents being home, the babysitter would appraise this as positive and associate the noise with the family coming home in the future. If it was because someone was trying to break into the house, the babysitter would appraise this with a fearful response to the door making noises in the future.</span>
