Answer: Verbal persuasion
Explanation:
Verbal persuasion is a verbal encouragement and motivation provided by others to the individual which helps in individual to attain and seek a goal and this encouragement helps a person to attain capability to perform a particular task successfully and with ease and interest. Verbal persuasion can be provided by parents to their children, teachers to their students, friend to another friend, and by any well wisher.
According to the given situation, Maria is being motivated by her friends and coworkers by verbal persuasion to prepare holiday meal.
D. A speech should never be excessively reliant on a single source. While multiple sources make a speech stronger and gets the point across better, it's also not a good thing to overly rely on support. Your own ideas are needed, too.
Kings/Queens
Nobles
Peasants
Serfs
If priest/clergy is in your topic...
Church
Kings/Queens
Nobles
Peasants
Serfs
Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Britan and France are the two imperialist nations that controlled the most territory in Africa.
