Note that
1.
The x-intercepts are at points x=-3, x=0, x=2. The graph should be increasing - decreasing - increasing.
2.
The x-intercepts are at points x=-2, x=0, x=3. The graph should be increasing - decreasing - increasing.
3.
The x-intercepts are at points x=-3, x=0, x=2. The graph should be decreasing - increasing - decreasing.
4.
The x-intercepts are at points x=-2, x=0, x=3. The graph should be decreasing - increasing - decreasing.
From the diagram you can see that x-intercepts are at points x=-3, x=0, x=2 and the graph is decreasing-increasing-decreasing.
Answer: correct choice is 3.
Answer:
3 times n minus n = 18
both n's equal the same number
The initial pay rate is $16.00. It is also mentioned that the price is marked up by 78.7%. It means that the prices are increased by 78.7%. Also, there is a profit of 10% too. So, the pay rates after mark up will be
$16.00 + (78.7% of 16.00)
= $16.00 + $12.592
=$28.592
And the pay rates after estimated profit is
$28.592 + (10% of $28.592)
= $28.592 + $2.8592
= $31.4512
Hence, the revised bill rate, rounded to the nearest cent is $31.45.
Answer:
16%
Step-by-step explanation:
The data provided on brand purchased by age group is.
A total of 50 cars were sold this month.
Since the number of buyers 40 years or older that purchased a Honda is 8, the percentage is:
16% of buyers were 40 years or older and purchased a Honda.
The value of any number multiplied by 1 stays exactly the same, right? Well, as it turns out, 1 can be written as the fraction 7/7, or the fraction 8/8, or 9/9, 10/10, 11/11... I could go on and on to infinity, but there's a pattern there. 1 simply means "1 whole," or "all of it." "All of it" looks different in different denominators, but the core idea is the same: if we split something into n pieces, "all of it" means we have all n of those pieces. The numerator and denominator will always been the same, no matter how we want to represent 1.
What does this have to do with our problem? Well, we don't want to change the <em>value </em>of our fraction, we just want to change its <em>label</em>. So what we're going to do is multiply it by 1, but we're going to make sure to pick the right <em>label</em> for that 1.
7/12 x 1 = 7/12. This will be true no matter what. Let's see which of these options actually fit the bill:
Can we get this fraction by multiplying 7/12 from some form of 1? Well, 14 = 7 x 2, so let's see what we get if we pick the form 1 = 2/2:
Nope, not quite. 14/28 is <em>not </em>equivalent to 7/12.
What about 21/36? 21 = 7 x 3, so let's give the form 1 = 3/3 a shot:
There we go! All we did there was <em>relabel </em>7/12 by multiplying by form of 1. Since we never changed its value, we can stop our search here and conclude that 21/36 is equivalent to 7/12.
