<span>it requires a company or individual divide resources on multiple targets rather than one. Therefore, one must use these resources more efficiently because he or she is using the same amount, usually concentrated on one target, on multiple. A company should only use this strategy if it is extremely confident in its ability to market simultaneously to multiple groups.</span>
Answer:
The computation is shown below:
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
a. Account payable $70,000
To Notes payable $70,000
(Being the issuance of the note is recorded)
b. Note payable $70,000
Interest expense $1,575
To Cash $71,575
(Being the payment of the note at maturity date including interest is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
= $70,000 × 9% × 90 days ÷ 360 days
= $1,575
We assume 360 days in a year
Now the effects on the accounts and the financing statement for issuance of the note is shown below:
Balance sheet
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholder equity Income statement cash flow statement
No effect = Account payable - $52,000 + No effect No effect + no effect
Note payable + $52,000
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
