Answer:
d. An interest group is more likely than a political party to support a change in public policy.
Explanation:
Here the correct answer is an interest group that is more likely to support a change in public policy because the group of people who wishes a change in the policy is more likely to support for the change than any other organisation.
That particular interest group may not like the public policy framed by the government and wants some amendments in the policy, So it is more likely that the interest group will support for the change in the policy than the government.
Thus the correct answer is
d. An interest group is more likely than a political party to support a change in public policy.
Answer:
Con: the constitution isn't specific and can in turn be used to validate improper things for example if the constitution doesn't specify and what a president show be like and states that anyone born in specific country and over the age of 36 can be president this means even criminals can be president which is a major con.
Pro: there is more diverse ideas to be heard because the constitution doesn't restrict people beliefs for example: A Muslim, Christian, atheist, agnostic, Buddhist person,etc can be president because the constitution doesn't restrict it and allows the free speech.
Explanation:
:)
The answer to this question is <span>People will seek out supporting evidence for their beliefs.
The danger of this kind of thinking is that it makes people surround themselves with likeminded people, and perceive their group as the group that always right. This could led them unable to deal with opposing opinion that led to the formation of 'safe-spaces' that we often see in college campus.</span>
