The essay should show your opinion and understanding of the past presidents' debates. As I do not have access to your interpretations of the debate, I cannot write the essay, but I will show you how to write it.
<h3>Essay structure</h3>
- Introduction: Write a short paragraph, about what this speech was and how inflation was a subject covered in it.
- Thesis statement: Write a single sentence, which should end your introduction. The thesis statement should show which candidate approached the topic of inflation most convincingly in your opinion.
- Body: Write two paragraphs. These paragraphs must be long because they are the ones where you will show your positions on the debate. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that your thesis statement is correct, showing the reasons that make you believe that a candidate was more convincing and approached the subject correctly. In the second paragraph, you will criticize the way the other candidate approached the subject and show the reasons that make that candidate's arguments not convincing to you.
- Conclusion: You will write a short paragraph, where you will show and reinforce your thesis statement, reaffirming the candidate who was most efficient and how the words of this candidate were in line with the society of that time.
You will need to watch, listen or read the debate to write this essay and you can use articles that analyze the performance of the two candidates to strengthen your arguments.
Below you can see an example of how you can write the introduction and thesis statement for your essay:
<em>The debate between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan was one of the major milestones of the 1980 presidential election. In that year, American society suffered from a lack of economic stability and rising inflation, which made this one of the most important issues in the debate. , which was best addressed by Reagan.</em>
Learn more about what inflation is:
brainly.com/question/15555995
#SPJ1
Answer:
On an inscription at the riverfront of the Rubicon River, was written, that soldiers, flags, or weapons are not allowed beyond the river
However, knowing that he would have suffered death if he went into Rome alone, and that by crossing the river, the legion and himself are sentenced to death (or could cause a coup) automatically, therefore, by leading about 5,000 men across the Rubicon, then he (and his legion) have cast the die, (their goal is not for Julius Caeser or them to be killed) and it will eventually rest with a side up, therefore, their cause of action has started (which is to go into Rome and preserve themselves) and even if they stop (stop the die) there is still an outcome (punishment/coup), and therefore, there is no going back
Explanation:
Answer:
Nevada
Explanation:
Based on the information given her legal state of residence will be NEVADA reason been that we were told that she was ORIGINALLY from NEVADA which means that her state of origin is NEVADA due to the fact that the word "ORIGINALLY" tend to indicate that at the very first beginning she was from NEVADA or at the beginning she was from NEVADA before going to other countries such as Qatar,Kansas,Fort Bragg,GA, Aniston and AL.
Therefore Danielle's legal state of residence is NEVADA.
Explanation:
buenos dias,porque contigo yo escoji ahorami corazon ta sufri bien simple lang iyo tapidi ela cin ti tu el co sa yo ya cinti
Answer:
D. reductionism
Explanation:
Reductionism is the philosophical position characterized by the thesis that the properties of the whole can be reduced to the properties of its parts, thus reducing the number of elements in a theory or conclusion and can be applied to phenomena, theories, meanings, objects and even explanations. It is a metaphysical position that consists in the hypothesis that reality is composed of a minimum number of types of entities or substances. An example of this was the case of Henry Handsome who, because of the emergence of a European bank, interpreted that it would be beneficial for his wealthy friends to sell his shares. Henry believed that a whole could be reduced to its parts.
