Answer:
Option G, (x, y) → (x + 2, y - 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Find the translation</u>
2 units to the right means (x + 2)
3 units down mean (y - 3)
(x, y) → (x + 2, y - 3)
Answer: Option G, (x, y) → (x + 2, y - 3)
Answer:
32.49%
Step-by-step explanation:
1 person probability of owning a dog is 0.57, now probability of 2 owning a dog is and 3 would be so yeah its 0.3249.
Answer: No he does not meet both of his expectation by cooking 10 batches of spaghetti and 4 batches of lasagna.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since here S represents the number of batches of spaghetti and L represents the total number of lasagna.
And, the chef planed to use at least 4.5 kilograms of pasta and more than 6.3 liters of sauce to cook spaghetti and lasagna.
Which is shown by the below inequality,
----------(1)
And, --------(2)
By putting S = 10 and L = 4 in the inequality (1),
⇒ (true)
Thus, for the values S = 10 and L = 4 the inequality (1) is followed.
Again By putting S = 10 and L = 4 in the inequality (2),
⇒ ( false)
But, for the values S = 10 and L = 4 the inequality (2) is not followed.
Therefore, Antonius does not meet both of his expectations by cooking 10 batches of spaghetti and 4 batches of lasagna.
Answer:
a. ∆EGF ≅ ∆EGD
Step-by-step explanation:
Congruent triangles would have the same side lengths and the same measure of angles.
From the figure given:
EG in ∆EGF ≅ EG in ∆EGD
GF in ∆EGF ≅ GD in ∆EGD, also
EF ≅ ED.
The three angles in ∆EFG are also congruent to the three angles in ∆EGD.
Therefore, ∆EGD is congruent to ∆EGF.
∆EGF ≅ ∆EGD
Answer:
It has been scaled down by 3.
Step-by-step explanation: