Answer:
Answer 1.
Beneath referenced pointers show that organization arranged the liquidation for recent years or something like that.
- The way that there had been no interest in R&D for recent years which more likely than not brought about noteworthy cost putting something aside for the organization.
- BBB bought expanded size of stock on layaway from providers in recent years which is a warning.
- Indeed, even without bringing about any R&D cost for recent years, CFO of BBB moved toward the bank to expand the credit line of the organization and utilized all credit line without legitimate desk work.
- CFO erroneously guaranteed the brokers about new product offering so as to look for advances/increment credit line.
- Indeed, even with diminished deals, organization was indicating lower supply of stock. They more likely than not been offering the stock at cost to outsider or shrouded it at an undisclosed area to dupe the providers.
- With no interest in R&D and declining business possibilities, organization couldn't have given new offers for subsidizing
Answer 2.
Yes, even if it is a fraudulent filing for bankruptcy, BBB organization despite everything can select to petition for financial protection or BBB can close the business through and through and escape with the reserve funds and continues from the offer of the stock. Indeed, even leasers and providers reserve the option to petition for automatic insolvency against the BBB in the event that BBB doesn't seek financial protection.
It thoroughly relies upon the BBB Company, in the event that it selects to declare financial insolvency under section 7, or 11 of the liquidation code. Be that as it may, it is just under section 11 liquidation procedures of the chapter 11 court it very well may be set up that BBB's aim and untrustworthy strategic policies establishes to insolvency misrepresentation.
Answer: $10,906
Explanation:
Given that,
Purchased machinery at the beginning of Year 1 = $86,100
machinery has an estimated life of five years,
Estimated residual value = $4,305
Accumulated depreciation = $49,077 at the end of Year 2
Year 3 Depreciation expense:
= 
= 
= $10,906
Answer:
B) $617,000
Explanation:
Issuance capital of 500,000 shall remain constant. Out of the current year net earnings 25000 we are paying 2000 as dividend so, that adds to the owners equity = 23000.
Total liabilities = total assets = 500000 + 23000 + 94000 = 617000
To find simple interest:
Time = Interest/(Principle)(Rate)
Interest is the amount of interest paid
Principle is the amount you lent or borrow
Rate is the percentage of principle charged as interest each year
Time is the years of the loan
P=Principle amount of $1,500
I=Interest amount of $1,200 (Take the new amount of $2,700 and subtract from the principle that is $1,500 which gives you $1,200)
r= as a decimal .15 (15%/100)
t=unknown
T=I/PR
T=1,200/(1,500)(.15)
T=1,200/225
T=5.3 years
It would take Lance roughly 5.3 years
Answer:
E) if the firm evaluates these projects and all other projects at the new overall corporate wacc, it will probably become riskier over time.
Explanation:
Before the merger, Audaco would have rejected any project with an IRR of less than 12% (more risky investments) while Careco only required a 10% IRR (less risky projects). But after the merger the combined WACC will be lower than Audaco's, but higher than Careco's. Therefore, the new merged company will start accepting more risky projects and that tendency will continue over time. Eventually, the company's WACC will have to adjust and increase, and the cycle will continue.
