Answer:
Toxic Substances Control Act
Explanation:
Administered by the Environmental Protection Agency of the united states of America, the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 authorizes EPA to regulate the chemicals, record-keeping and testing, distribution of chemicals and restrictions on chemical substances and/or mixtures. Some substances, including food, drugs, cosmetics, and pesticides, are generally excluded from TSCA.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The term of office for federal judges is that they serve for life.
The logic behind this provision is the following.
Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States, but this appointment has to be ratified by the United States Senate or upper chamber.
Federal judges serve for life because this gives them security on this difficult job and they feel no pressure at all to make a decision that could be unpopular. Federal judges have to resolve the most complicated cases in the US or the most controversial. That is why they have to feel confident about the decision they will make. Furthermore, they serve for life because they do not depend on the sympathy of one president, or be afraid that when a new one comes to power they could be removed.
They were expelled from Bermuda for their failure to swear allegiance to the crown
Answer:
a). DOES
b). DOES NOT
Explanation:
A fallacy is the reasoning which is logically incorrect, it undermines the logical validity of the argument, and is also recognized as unsound. It is the use of the invalid reasoning or faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument.
In the context, it is given that every time the fire station's alarm rings, I understand that fire has broken out somewhere nearby. And if one needs to stop the risk of fire, then one should prohibit sounding the alarm of the fire station.
Thus this statement is the false reasoning and is logically incorrect. Sounding of the alarm does not causes the fire. So it does commit a fallacy and it does not commit an appeal to ignorance fallacy.