The most likely explanation why the hiring authority is not using contractors or temporary instructors is a, The hiring authority thinks that full-time hires are more productive.
<h3>Why might hiring authorities prefer full time workers?</h3><h3 />
If a hiring authority feels that full time hires are better at their jobs and more productive, they will hire more of them.
This would lead to temporary workers and contractors being used for projects less.
Find out more on full time work at brainly.com/question/16905571
#SPJ1
<span>$41
Given a discount rate, the present value (PV) of money you expect to receive in the future (FV) at a specified interest rate (R) for a specified number of periods (N) is
PV = FV/(1+R)^N
So let's plug in the known values and solve.
PV = 45/(1+0.10)^1
PV = 45/(1.10)^1
PV = 45/1.10
PV = 40.90909091
Rounding to the nearest dollar gives $41</span>
Answer:
d. even if Ichiro was only slightly at fault.
Explanation:
If Ichiro is suing Heather for negligence, but he himself is found to have negiglent as well, his possibilities of winning the case are less even if he was only slightly at fault.
This is because the fact that he was negligent as well reduces his condition of victim, and makes him an active participant in the accident. In other words, if Ichiro is found negligent, it means that the accident and his subsequent injuries were also his fault.
it looks to me that the answer could be C
Explanation:
it may be C
Answer:
Choosing alternative B would increase net income by $17,100
Explanation:
The analysis showing the incremental revenues,costs and net income of alternative A and B is shown below:
Alternative A Alternative B Difference between A&B
Revenues $146,100 $185,900 $39800
Costs ($104,400) ($127,100) ($22700
)
Net income $41,700 $58,800 $17,100
Alternative B records a higher net income compared to Alternative A,hence choosing alternative B would increase net income by $17,100
r
