1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aloiza [94]
3 years ago
12

A fundamental difference between the command system and laissez-faire capitalism is that, in command systems: A. the division of

output is decided by central planning rather than by individuals operating freely through markets. B. scarcity does not exist, whereas it does in laissez-faire capitalism. C. money is not used, whereas it is in laissez-faire capitalism. D. all economic decisions are made by the government, whereas there is no government in laissez-faire capitalism.
Social Studies
1 answer:
SSSSS [86.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. the division of output is decided by central planning rather than by individuals operating freely through markets.

Explanation:

Laissez - Faire capitalism and Command system are different from one another. The difference between them is that in command system the central planning decides the division of the output while in Laissez-Faire capitalism the individuals operating freely through the markets. Decides the division of the output.

Hence the answer is option A.

You might be interested in
Why did the United States invade Iraq in 2003?
VARVARA [1.3K]

Answer:

The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.

Explanation:

The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily <u>end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein</u>. Other purposes were to <u>end the harboring of terrorists in the land</u> and <u>eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of</u>.

The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.

5 0
3 years ago
Is the government doing enough to ensure that human rights are being protected
Oliga [24]

As of now, the government is doing an enough job to ensure that human rights are being protected through providing basic human rights such as food, water, and shelter. Though this is the case, we cannot deny the fact that there should be progress in terms of the different possibilities that the government may offer in order to address the current problems available right now. These human rights are being addressed, but of course, there should always be progress. 

3 0
3 years ago
How can ad extensions contribute to increasing user engagement? With attractive images and videos. Ad extensions include a "like
Vlada [557]

Answer: The correct answer is "By adressing a user's intent, device and location" since those strategies help ads to reach the most likely buyers of its products.

8 0
3 years ago
What did Austria Hungary do in 1908 that increased Pre-war tension in Europe
kari74 [83]

Answer:

Austria-Hungary increased tension prior to WWI by announcing the annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in October of 1908.

Explanation:

This act created a lot of diplomatic tension as there were many alliances across this region involving Russia, Germany, and the Ottoman Empire, for example. In addition, Serbia objected to the Austria-Hungary annexation as they were geographically close and ethnically tied to Bosnia and Herzegovina.  The foreign minister of Russia had to support the Serbian claims because the Russian public was very critical of Austria. Austria-Hungary was supported however by the Germans and they backed the annexation and threatened aggression against Serbia unless Russia and Serbia conceded. Bosnia and Herzegovina had been under the control of the Ottoman Empire but Turkey was also experiencing its own forms of unrest and political instability. It was a period where many of the old regimes were being challenged.  

8 0
3 years ago
How are presidents elected?
Marrrta [24]
<span>B) indirectly, by the Electoral College
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Master said, "To rule a country of a thousand chariots, there must be reverent [worshipful] attention to business, and since
    13·1 answer
  • Which features characterize the Piedmont region?
    13·1 answer
  • A researcher wants to describe children's normal behavior on the playground. the best method for this research is to use
    14·2 answers
  • The united states maintains which type of tax system?
    12·1 answer
  • Which revolution led to increases in global tood production as a result of using genetically altered seeds and large amounts otc
    13·1 answer
  • Which geographic location is least affected by piracy? A. Gulf of Aden B. Cape of Good Hope C. Gulf of Guinea D. Indian Ocean
    14·1 answer
  • Please help quickly!
    8·1 answer
  • Why is it correct to state that the ideas of the American Revolution changed the way people viewed slavery. help me and i will g
    5·1 answer
  • Who insulted Senator Andrew Butler and was beaten.​
    9·2 answers
  • IMPORTANT PLEASE HELP: Based on what you know about population destiny in the United States, how would you describe the pattern
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!