Area of part 1:A1=base*height/2=(8+2)*(8-2-2-1)/2=10*3/2=15 ft^2Area of part 2:A2=length*width=(8+2)*1=10 ft2Area of part 3:A3=length*width=8*2=16 ft2
Total shaded area : A1+A2+A3=41 ft2Total area of the reactangle : A=16*8=128 ft2Total area of the nonshaded region : 128-41=87 ft2
Answer:




Step-by-step explanation:
We have that:

When we substitute n=1, we get:

When we substitute n=2 we get:

When we substitute n=3, we get:

When we substitute n=n+1, we get:

Now

We expand and simplify to obtain:


Isosceles triangle scalene triangle and equaliteral triangle
Yes it is true that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars because null hypothesis is rejected.
Given among 2049 Connecticut passenger cars, 239 had only rear license plates. Among 334 Connecticut trucks, 45 had only rear license plates.
let
be the probability that commercial cars have rear license plates and
be the probability that connected trucks have rear license plates.
Cars Trucks Total
Total 2049 334 2383
x 239 45 284
p 0.1166 0.1347 0.1191
α=0.05
Hypothesis will be :


It is a left tailed test at 0.05 significance.
Standard errors of p=
=
=
=0.0066
Test statistic Z=p difference/standard error
=(0.1166-0.1347)/0.0066
=-0.0181/0.0061
=-2.967
p value=0.001505<5%
Since p is less than 5% we reject null hypothesis.
We cannot calculate standard deviation so we cannot calculate confidence interval.
Hence there is statistical evidence at 5% significance level to support that commercial truck owners violate laws requiring front license plates at a higher rate than owners of passenger cars.
Learn more about z test at brainly.com/question/14453510
#SPJ4
Hello,
Here is your answer:
The proper answer to this question is option D "4.19%".
Your answer is D.
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!