Answer:
$105,075
Explanation:
The computation of the operating income is shown below:
Sales (4 × 69,500) $278,000
Less:Variable costs (0.95 × 69,500 + 5% × 278,000) $79,925
Contribution margin $198,075
Less: fixed cost (13,000 + 80,000) $93,000
Net operating income $105,075
We simply deduct the variable cost and the fixed cost from the sales to arrive at the net operating income
Answer:
a. $349,700
b. $209,900
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Before computing the cash payment made to supplier first we have to find out the purchase amount which is shown below:
(a) Change in Finished goods + purchase = Cost of goods sold
-$25,800 + purchases = $307,000
So, the purchase is $332,800
Now
Cash paid to supplier is
= $332,800 + $16,900
= $349,700
And,
(b) Cash paid for operating expenses is
= $229,000 - $8,000 - $11,100
= $209,900
When the intervention rises the price stage of goods, then the incentive to supply extra desires increases and consequently growing manufacturers' surplus. So policy market can motivate both client and producer surplus.
A tax causes consumer surplus and producer surplus (earnings) to fall.. some of those losses are captured inside the tax, however, there may be a loss captured with the aid of no celebration—the value of the devices that could be exchanged had been there no tax. those lost gains from trade are called deadweight losses.
For each monetary transaction, there can be both producer surplus (or profit) and client surplus. The mixture–or blended–a surplus is called the economic surplus.
Learn more about policy market here: brainly.com/question/25754149
#SPJ4
That would be John D. Rockefeller who gained control over the oil market by buying up small companies and sell oil at a significantly lower price to force his competitors to sell to him and them when he had majority control over the oil market he them just muscled the remaining out of business and then jack up the price on his oil to rake in huge profits. <span />
Taxing a good with relatively less elastic demand, helps government to raise more revenue with lower welfare loss.