The answer: 7 * 1,829 = " 12,803 " . ______________ <span>The following is the explanation—"in expanded form" — (as per the specfic instructions— within this very question—as to how to get the answer: </span>____________________ Given: 7 * 1,829 = ? ; Find the solution; using "expanded form" : ____________ (7 * 9 = 63 ) ; +
(7 *20 = 140) ; +
(7 * 800 = 5,600) ; + ___________________________________________ (7 * 1,000 = 7,000) ; ___________________________________________ Now, add the the values together to solve the problem: ___________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = 63 + 140 + 5,600 + 7,000 ; { = 203 + 5,600 + 7,000 } ; { = 5,803 + 7,000 } ; = 12,803 ; which is the answer. ________________________________________________ Alternately, write out the steps as follows—using "expanded form": ________________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = ? ________________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = (7*9) + (7*20) + (7*800) + (1,000) ; ________________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = 63 + 140 + 5,600 + 1,000 ; { = 203 + 5,600 + 7,000 } ; { = 5,803 + 7,000 } ; = 12,803 ; which is the answer. ____ → {Now, is our obtained answer: "12,803" ; the "correct answer"—to the problem: " 7 * 1,829 " ;} ??
→ Let us check: {Note: " 7 * 1,829 " ; is the same as: ↔ " 1,829 * 7 ".}. → Using a calculator, does: "7 * 1829 = ? 12,803" ?? ; Yes! ; →&, for that matter; does: " 1829 * 7 =? 12,803" ?? ; Yes! . _______ Furthermore, let us check, using the "traditional format" ; → Does: "1,829 * 7 =? 12,803 ?? " ; ________ {NB: We are multiplying 2 (TWO) numbers together; & 1 (ONE) of these 2 [TWO] numbers is a "1-digit" ["single-digit"] number; & the "OTHER" multiplicand is a "multiple-digit" [specifically, a"4-digit"] number.}. ______ NB: Yes; using a calculator is sufficient. Below, I simply provide an alternate method to confirm whether our "obtained value" is correct. _____ → Does: "7 * 1,289 = ? 12,803" ?? ; → Using the "traditional method"; let us check; as follows: _____ ₅ ₂ ₆ → 1, 829 <span><u> * 7 </u></span> 12 8 03 ; _____ So; does: "12,803 =? 12,803" ?? ; YES! → This "traditional method" shows that: "7 * 1,829" ; does, in fact, equal: "12,803". _____ {NB: Explanation of the steps used in solving the aforementioned problem using the "traditional method"—just for clarification and confirmation} : _____ →Start with: "7*9= 63" ; Write down the "3" & 'carry over' the "6" ; {Note the small-sized digit, "6"; written on top of the "2"; {commonly done—to keep track);
→Then; "7*2 = 14" ; then add the "small digit 6"; to the "14" ; →"14+6 =20" ; Write down the "0" ; & 'carry over' the "2" ; {Note the "small-sized digit, "2"; written over the "8"; (commonly done—to keep track);
→ Then; "7*8 = 56" ; then add the "small digit 2"; to the "56"; → "56+2 = 58" ; Write down the "8" ; & 'carry over' the "5" ; {Note the "small-sized digit", "5" ; written over the "1" ; (commonly done—to keep track);
→Then; "7*1 = 7" ; then add the "small digit 5"; to the "7" ; → "7+5 = 12" ; Write down the "12" ; in its entirety—since are no digits left [in the multiplicand, "1,829"] ; to "carry over". ____ We get: "12,803" ; which =? "12,803" ?? ;→Yes! ____ I hope my explanation of how to solve "7 * 1,829" ; using the "expanded form" is helpful. Also, i hope my explanation—albeit lengthy— of confirming that [<em>our</em>] "correctly obtained value"—which is: "12,803"— is of some help. __
This is a system of equations and in this you see there is 3x and negative three x. To solve this you need tp get rid of one of the variables. so we can add the two equations together to get 3y=6. This means that y=2 if we divide by 3 on both sides. Then we just plug 3 in for y and we get 3x+10=7. We subtract 10 on both sides to get 2x=-3 which means x=-1.
area of parallelogram = 8 x 15 =120 so, they have the same area, because the length of a rectangle is the same as the height of a parallelogram and also for the base.