The answer: 7 * 1,829 = " 12,803 " . ______________ <span>The following is the explanation—"in expanded form" — (as per the specfic instructions— within this very question—as to how to get the answer: </span>____________________ Given: 7 * 1,829 = ? ; Find the solution; using "expanded form" : ____________ (7 * 9 = 63 ) ; +
(7 *20 = 140) ; +
(7 * 800 = 5,600) ; + ___________________________________________ (7 * 1,000 = 7,000) ; ___________________________________________ Now, add the the values together to solve the problem: ___________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = 63 + 140 + 5,600 + 7,000 ; { = 203 + 5,600 + 7,000 } ; { = 5,803 + 7,000 } ; = 12,803 ; which is the answer. ________________________________________________ Alternately, write out the steps as follows—using "expanded form": ________________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = ? ________________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = (7*9) + (7*20) + (7*800) + (1,000) ; ________________________________________________ → 7 * 1,829 = 63 + 140 + 5,600 + 1,000 ; { = 203 + 5,600 + 7,000 } ; { = 5,803 + 7,000 } ; = 12,803 ; which is the answer. ____ → {Now, is our obtained answer: "12,803" ; the "correct answer"—to the problem: " 7 * 1,829 " ;} ??
→ Let us check: {Note: " 7 * 1,829 " ; is the same as: ↔ " 1,829 * 7 ".}. → Using a calculator, does: "7 * 1829 = ? 12,803" ?? ; Yes! ; →&, for that matter; does: " 1829 * 7 =? 12,803" ?? ; Yes! . _______ Furthermore, let us check, using the "traditional format" ; → Does: "1,829 * 7 =? 12,803 ?? " ; ________ {NB: We are multiplying 2 (TWO) numbers together; & 1 (ONE) of these 2 [TWO] numbers is a "1-digit" ["single-digit"] number; & the "OTHER" multiplicand is a "multiple-digit" [specifically, a"4-digit"] number.}. ______ NB: Yes; using a calculator is sufficient. Below, I simply provide an alternate method to confirm whether our "obtained value" is correct. _____ → Does: "7 * 1,289 = ? 12,803" ?? ; → Using the "traditional method"; let us check; as follows: _____ ₅ ₂ ₆ → 1, 829 <span><u> * 7 </u></span> 12 8 03 ; _____ So; does: "12,803 =? 12,803" ?? ; YES! → This "traditional method" shows that: "7 * 1,829" ; does, in fact, equal: "12,803". _____ {NB: Explanation of the steps used in solving the aforementioned problem using the "traditional method"—just for clarification and confirmation} : _____ →Start with: "7*9= 63" ; Write down the "3" & 'carry over' the "6" ; {Note the small-sized digit, "6"; written on top of the "2"; {commonly done—to keep track);
→Then; "7*2 = 14" ; then add the "small digit 6"; to the "14" ; →"14+6 =20" ; Write down the "0" ; & 'carry over' the "2" ; {Note the "small-sized digit, "2"; written over the "8"; (commonly done—to keep track);
→ Then; "7*8 = 56" ; then add the "small digit 2"; to the "56"; → "56+2 = 58" ; Write down the "8" ; & 'carry over' the "5" ; {Note the "small-sized digit", "5" ; written over the "1" ; (commonly done—to keep track);
→Then; "7*1 = 7" ; then add the "small digit 5"; to the "7" ; → "7+5 = 12" ; Write down the "12" ; in its entirety—since are no digits left [in the multiplicand, "1,829"] ; to "carry over". ____ We get: "12,803" ; which =? "12,803" ?? ;→Yes! ____ I hope my explanation of how to solve "7 * 1,829" ; using the "expanded form" is helpful. Also, i hope my explanation—albeit lengthy— of confirming that [<em>our</em>] "correctly obtained value"—which is: "12,803"— is of some help. __