1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex Ar [27]
3 years ago
11

Please help. thank you

Mathematics
2 answers:
Strike441 [17]3 years ago
7 0

The first answer is correct

Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:6 units^2

Cut the shape in two to make a square and triangle.

Square:(2)(2)=4

Triangle:(1/2)(2)(2)=2

add both together 4+2=6

You might be interested in
Lagrange multipliers have a definite meaning in load balancing for electric network problems. Consider the generators that can o
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

The load balance (x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8) Mw minimizes the total cost

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Optimizing With Lagrange Multipliers</u>

When a multivariable function f is to be maximized or minimized, the Lagrange multipliers method is a pretty common and easy tool to apply when the restrictions are in the form of equalities.

Consider three generators that can output xi megawatts, with i ranging from 1 to 3. The set of unknown variables is x1, x2, x3.

The cost of each generator is given by the formula

\displaystyle C_i=3x_i+\frac{i}{40}x_i^2

It means the cost for each generator is expanded as

\displaystyle C_1=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2

\displaystyle C_2=3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2

\displaystyle C_3=3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2

The total cost of production is

\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2+3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2+3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2

Simplifying and rearranging, we have the objective function to minimize:

\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)

The restriction can be modeled as a function g(x)=0:

g: x_1+x_2+x_3=1000

Or

g(x_1,x_2,x_3)= x_1+x_2+x_3-1000

We now construct the auxiliary function

f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=C(x_1,x_2,x_3)-\lambda g(x_1,x_2,x_3)

\displaystyle f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)-\lambda (x_1+x_2+x_3-1000)

We find all the partial derivatives of f and equate them to 0

\displaystyle f_{x1}=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1-\lambda=0

\displaystyle f_{x2}=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2-\lambda=0

\displaystyle f_{x3}=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3-\lambda=0

f_\lambda=x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0

Solving for \lambda in the three first equations, we have

\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1

\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2

\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3

Equating them, we find:

x_1=3x_3

\displaystyle x_2=\frac{3}{2}x_3

Replacing into the restriction (or the fourth derivative)

x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0

\displaystyle 3x_3+\frac{3}{2}x_3+x_3-1000=0

\displaystyle \frac{11}{2}x_3=1000

x_3=181.8\ MW

And also

x_1=545.5\ MW

x_2=272.7\ MW

The load balance (x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8) Mw minimizes the total cost

5 0
4 years ago
Suppose the professor decides to grade on a curve. If the professor wants 16% of the students to get an A, what is the minimum s
vladimir1956 [14]
There isn't enough info to determine that, I believe. You would need an equation that would allow me to determine the minimum output for an A.
3 0
3 years ago
Are the points U, H, and L collinear?<br> U<br> E<br> S<br> H
butalik [34]

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Collinear means points are lying on the same straight line. U, H, and L are all lying on the line l.

4 0
3 years ago
Make s, u subject of the formula<br><img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=v%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20u%20%7B%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%202as" id="
Romashka [77]

Answer:

s = \frac{v^2-u^2}{2a}

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

v² = u² + 2as ( subtract u² from both sides )

v² - u² = 2as ( divide both sides by 2a )

\frac{v^2-u^2}{2a} = s

Given

v² = u² + 2as ( subtract 2as from both sides )

v² - 2as = u² ( take the square root of both sides )

± \sqrt{v^2-2as} = u

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help with this
Arturiano [62]

The missing side of the triangles are 5, 16.92, 7 and 5 respectively.

Step-by-step explanation:

  • Step 1: Use the Pythagoras Theorem to find the missing sides.

a² + b² = c²

In the first triangle, a = 3, b = 4.

c² = 3² + 4² = 9 + 16 = 25

⇒ c = 5

∴ Missing side is 5

In the second triangle, a = 15, b = 8

c² = 15² + 8² = 225 + 64 = 289

⇒ c = 16.92

Missing side is 16.92

In the third triangle, b = 24, c = 25

a² = c² - b²

a² = 25² - 24² = 625 - 576 = 49

⇒ a = 7

Missing side is 7

In the fourth triangle, a = 12, c = 13

b² = c² - a²

b² = 13² - 12² = 169 - 144 = 25

⇒ b = 5

Missing side is 5

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 656,32.25 in expanded form
    5·1 answer
  • X−37=4<br><br> Enter your answer in the box in simplest form.<br> x =
    6·1 answer
  • Convert 5 inches per second to feet per minute.
    14·1 answer
  • Google says the answer is -6 but i have no idea how it got that<br> (-17) -4 +19 + (-4)
    12·1 answer
  • Find the radius of a circle with an area of 380 square inches. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth
    10·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with Writing equations of lines
    14·1 answer
  • Briooooo wat is dis answer I need HELP
    6·2 answers
  • HEEEELPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • It’s about add and subtract so whats 1-3/8
    8·1 answer
  • Write two fractions whose product is between 1/5 and 1/2 , and whose sum is negative. please help asap!! thanks!
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!