Answer: The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
Explanation:
Based on the information given and assuming that both parties have moved for a directed verdict, then the court should not grant either of the motions.
The court shouldn't grant either of them motion, due to the fact that the jury must determine whether the damage was due to the technician's installation of the improper cooling panel.
Answer:
Therefore I can borrow $19646.12 from E-Loan.
The interest I will pay for the loan is $1,857.88.
Explanation:
The formula of present value is

PMT = The monthly payment = $448
i= Rate of interest per period 
n = The number of month = 48 months
Therefore

≈$19646.12
Therefore I can borrow $19646.12 from E-Loan.
The interest = Paid amount - Loan amount
=$[(448×48)-19646.12]
=$1,857.88
The interest I will pay for the loan is $1,857.88.
Answer:
c. $3,800
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount of taxable income
Using this formula
Taxable income =Interest income from a checking account+Interest income from corporate bonds +Interest income from federal bonds
Let plug in the formula
Taxable income =$1,000+$2,050+$750
Taxable income=$3,800
Therefore on his current year tax return the amount of his taxable income will be $3,800
The answer is: averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.
When we use principle of aggregation, we would not rely on single measurement to make a representation of a person's behavior. We rely more on multiple sets of measurements.
From the case above, Sheridan not attending the services for two weeks could be explained by things such as personal issues or physical illness. Since she considers herself as religious who attend regularly, it is very likely that averaged over time, Sheridan attends worship services regularly.