Answer:
The projects which maximize Vanguard's shareholder wealth are Project A; Project B; Project D.
Explanation:
Projects which maximize the shareholder value are projects delivering Expected Returns which are higher than its risk-adjusted weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
As a result, Project A with Expected return of 15% and risk adjusted WACC of 12%; Project B with Expected return of 12% and risk adjusted WACC of 10%; Project D with Expected return of 9% and risk adjusted WACC of 8%; are the projects that maximize the shareholder's value.
On the other hand, Project C with Expected return of 11% and risk adjusted WACC of 12% is harmful to shareholder value.
Answer:
14-Jan
Dr Trade Receivable $1,125
Cr Sales
14-jan
Dr Cost of sales 625
Cr Inventory 625
9-Apr
Dr Inventory 375
Cr Trade Payable 375
2-Sep
Dr Trade Receivable $2,500
Cr Sales $2,500
2 sep
Dr Cost of sales $1,375
Cr Inventory $1,375
Dec 31 No journal entry
Explanation:
Preparation to Records the month-end journal entries noted below, assuming the company uses a periodic inventory system
14-Jan
Dr Trade Receivable $1,125
Cr Sales (45*25)
14-jan
Dr Cost of sales[25*25] 625
Cr Inventory 625
9-Apr
Dr Inventory (25*$15) 375
Cr Trade Payable 375
2-Sep
Dr Trade Receivable $2,500
Cr Sales (50*50) $2,500
2 Sep
Dr Cost of sales $1,375
Cr Inventory $1,375
($2,500-$1,125)
Dec 31 No journal entry
Answer:
C. Labor becomes more divided as workers focus on certain skills.
Explanation:
Apex- Econ
Answer:
The delivery cycle time was 26.9
Explanation:
The delivery cycle time is computed as:
Delivery cycle time = Wait time + Throughput time
where
Wait time is 13.6
The formula for computing the throughput time is as:
Throughput time = Move time + Process time + Queue time + Inspection time
where
Move time is 3.3
Process time is 2.7
Queue time is 7.0
Inspection time is 0.3
Putting values above:
Throughput time = 3.3 + 2.7 + 7.0 + 0.3
Throughput time = 13.3
Now, putting both the values above:
Delivery cycle time = 13.6 + 13.3
Delivery cycle time = 26.9
Answer:
If a CPA does an audit irresponsibly, the CPA will be held liable to third parties who were recognized and not foreseeable to the CPA for gross negligence.
It needs to be specified if the third party had been “anticipatable,” liability; it may be recognized for ordinary negligence within a Rosenblum v. Adler decision.
Explanation:
