Answer:
Hoc potest interpretari latine
Explanation:
Because he dreamed of a united Spanish America and in the pursuit of that purpose he not only created Gran Colombia but also the Confederation of the Andes whose aim was to unite the aforementioned with Peru and Bolivia
James K Polk is one of the historical figures that is really hard to judge by modern standards.
He was a forceful man with strongly held beliefs. He was the last in the line of "Jacksonian Presidents" with all of the baggage that came along with that.
Ultimately, he was a strong war time President. His single term in office led to the short lived Presidency of Zachary Taylor, who was significantly less informed and forceful than Polk. After Polk, the issue of slavery really came to the forefront. Polk was either responsible for delaying the prominence of this issue or just got lucky. It is likely that history would look much differently if Polk had a second term and continued his aggressive posture towards America's future.
I'd say he was a good President, for his time, who strongly acted on the economy and in regards to Mexico but whose record looks abysmal by modern standards and values.
Answer:
1.)The Spanish Inquisition lasted from 1478 to 1834
2.)The Spanish Inquisition was headed by the Roman Catholic Church
3.)Spain was multiracial and multi-religious when the Spanish Inquisition began
4.) Once married, Ferdinand II and Isabella I furthered the Spanish Inquisition
5.)The Spanish Inquisition was extremely violent and discriminatory
6.)The Spanish Inquisition saw the creation of autos-da-fé
7.)A grand inquisitor acted as the head of the Spanish Inquisition
8.)Hundreds of thousands of Jewish and Muslim people were expelled from Spain during the Inquisition
9.)The Spanish Inquisition eventually turned on the Roman Catholics
10.)The Spanish Inquisition was finally suppressed in the 19th century
Explanation:
The answer is D because I learned this already and remember him being failed by one vote
