Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
The argument of moral reformer can be understood by using an example. If S would be a moral reformer, she is someone who believes that some aspects of her personal society's ethical compass are erroneous; she believes that behaviors that the code declares to be immoral are actually acceptable, or conversely.
Thus, both the moral reformers and relativism implies that there is not one correct actions but many as per the perspective of different doers.
Answer: A: the total number of people living in a certain (area)
Explanation: it's the measure of population per unit/ area
Answer:
The correct answer is C. the right to vote
Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
